Hey @esteve!

We don't have any particular concern about changing the license.

We'd like to spread its use and would love to get contributions, if you and the 
community believe that changing to MIT would benefit those purposes... we hear 
you. Certainly, matching meta-ros original license makes sense as well.

Let's see what others think about it.





---
[Visit 
Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-2-layer-for-openembedded-linux/2835/3) 
or reply to this email to respond.

To unsubscribe from these emails, [click 
here](https://discourse.ros.org/email/unsubscribe/5ea9ef190817144f07fcae4d05c8b2e943e4522d185b11774cc82c338c6a7576).
  • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Esteve' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Esteve' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Lukas Bulwahn' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux

Reply via email to