Hi Victor,

here just two comments:

- Did you already have a look at the content of this pull request 
https://github.com/bmwcarit/meta-ros/pull/538? Is it done identical? Or can we 
merge those two developments to a best solution of those two in your repository?

- Concerning the license, I chose MIT just as most layers did use MIT when I 
started meta-ros. I think more important than the license of the metadata, is 
actually this further important remark on the license: "All metadata is MIT 
licensed unless otherwise stated. Source code included in tree for individual 
recipes is under the LICENSE stated in each recipe (.bb file) unless otherwise 
stated." This allows others to take your patch files and contribute and merge 
them back into the main development without further legal considerations.
 
Best regards,

Lukas





---
[Visit 
Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-2-layer-for-openembedded-linux/2835/5) 
or reply to this email to respond.

To unsubscribe from these emails, [click 
here](https://discourse.ros.org/email/unsubscribe/292ec08be3d33c6fb112e27a4141256b3cc87cba30e49208dec0ca475b0adc76).
  • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Esteve' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Esteve' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Lukas Bulwahn' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux
    • ... 'Víctor Mayoral Vilches' via Mailing List of ROS Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux

Reply via email to