On Friday 28 September 2007, Porkchop wrote:
> On 28/09/07 22:42 -0400, Mike Kershaw wrote:
> > Another thing which occurred to me as I hit send, is that you may simply
> > be dealing with people who, like me, by default reply to someone
> > directly and the list at the same time with the 'group reply' option.
>
> I think thats it. Also, see the headers of each of these messages. The one
> I'm replying to now had this header: Reply-To: [email protected], Mike
> Kershaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It seems that the list will append itself to the "Reply-To:" header, rather
> than replace it (which I know Sympa did). Most mail clients, regardless of
> "group reply" or not, will by default reply to all the "Reply-To:"
> addresses.

   Yep, sure enough.  That explains the behavior that I was seeing; twice I 
was sent a private mail that was also sent to the list -- both were messages 
that were in reply to a msg I had sent to the list.  Not every mailing list 
message has the list and an individual email address in the Reply-To: header, 
but most of them do.
   The routing of the private messages vs the list messages appears to be 
different, too [being sent from the sender's ISP rather than Mhvlug's], so 
this isn't an issue of Mailman duplicating the messages --  it's just the 
Reply-To: header that's generating that by default from our mail clients.  
That also explains why the private messages aren't getting the normally added 
Mhvlug text at the bottom of the message.

   -- Chris

-- 

Chris Knadle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Mid-Hudson Valley Linux Users Group                  http://mhvlug.org          
   
http://mhvlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mhvlug                           
Upcoming Meetings (6pm - 8pm)                         MHVLS Auditorium          
                              
  Oct 3 - Security and Privacy
  Nov 7 - Django Python Application Framework

Reply via email to