On Sunday 30 September 2007, Sean Dague wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 08:45:41PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > > On Saturday 29 September 2007, Sean Dague wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 02:06:42PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > > > > On Saturday 29 September 2007, Sean Dague wrote: > > > > > There is an option in mailman for the list to attempt to remove > > > > > duplicates (i.e. if mailman sees you are in the To or CC list, it > > > > > won't send you a copy). This is not on by default as it breaks > > > > > people that filter on List-ID and want to see a consistent email > > > > > thread in their MHVLUG mail folder. > > > > > > > > Exactly; setting that option means only getting the private copy. > > > > Unfortunately this doesn't seem to be something that can be > > > > [properly] fixed from the Mailman options available to subscribers. > > > > > > > > A possibility is the first_strip_reply_to setting: > > > > > > > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2006-August/052820.htm > > > >l > > > > > > I think we're discussion 2 different things. > > > > > > The only posts with double reply-to are Mike's, as his client sets it > > > explicitly, which will only be getting him extra mail, so no one else > > > should worry about that. > > > > No. This message that I'm responding to is the third message that you > > yourself have sent me to both the list as well as directly since the > > switchover. Jay also sent me one on the RC helecopter thread. I don't > > think any of those were intentional -- just has to do with the Reply-To: > > header. > > Ok, I've got the Reply-To munging right now, I think. Hopefully that > address your issue now as well.
Ok. Thanks very much, Sean. I think you fixed it. Your reply came to me directly again also, but that's only because you replied to a previous message that hadn't been Reply-To munged yet. :-P Your message to the list looks Reply-To munged as expected. Unfortunately I don't think there was a good alternative to Reply-To munging. Mailers are supposed to reply to all addresses in the Reply-To header, even when choosing a normal Reply. That's the correct behavior as per RFC822, section 4.4.4. [The online Mailman docs on Reply-To munging has a link that makes reference to the RFC.] Hope to see you guys on Wednesday. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Mid-Hudson Valley Linux Users Group http://mhvlug.org http://mhvlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mhvlug Upcoming Meetings (6pm - 8pm) MHVLS Auditorium Oct 3 - Security and Privacy Nov 7 - Django Python Application Framework
