On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:53:49AM -0700, Dan Simoes wrote: > 1) yes to a 2nd list or use of tags. I agree, once conversations are moved > there they are probably dead, but it saves me hitting delete :)
Count me as an anti-tag vote. All too often I see tags turn into a bizzare police-state thing where new users are (sometimes violently) chastised for failure to anticipate needing one of a dozen obscure tags for every post, leading them to give up on posting all together. I'm very capable of putting my LUG email in its own folder automatically, and there isn't that much of it. I don't think we want to go raising the bar for cost-of-entry for new users, and I'm not looking forwards to every post having 3 follow-on posts complaining about lack of / improper use of tags. -m
pgpMCBPokpOH6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mid-Hudson Valley Linux Users Group http://mhvlug.org http://mhvlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mhvlug Upcoming Meetings (6pm - 8pm) MHVLS Auditorium Aug 4 - Samba Sep 1 - BOINC Oct 6 - Creating Firefox Extensions
