And when industries are caught in this nexus maybe we HAVE to bail them
out.
 
the auto industry NEEDS credit to sell cars.  The banks stopped credit
dead in it's tracks.  The automakers got caught in a nasty storm that
wasn't of their making.  congress did it to 'em, and i put nancy pelosi
and barney frank at the front of the list of those that have to go.  But
should we send a viable industry abroad because the banks or congress
screwed up?
 
even more important.  WE NEED heavy manufacturing in this country as a
matter of DEFENSE.
 
what are we going to do if we have to produce weapons of war to continue
our way of life?
 
buy it from the koreans, japanese, chinese, germans?  Does anyone with a
50 year or more view of world history think depending on one or all of
those nations to manufacture our weapons of mass destruction (and the US
is pretty much the only country in the world that has and uses them
regularly as a matter of policy) think that's a good idea?
 
we need the heavy industry here.
 
dan
 

________________________________

From: Casey Wheeler [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 2:06 PM
To: Dan Scolnick
Cc: Mark Phillips; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: NMC - Healthcare Crisis Debate


Sweet, we agree. These guys did fail to do the job they were employed to
do and should have lost their jobs. And most importantly, tax dollars
should not  bail out anyone or any industry. Period. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:00 PM, "Dan Scolnick" <[email protected]>
wrote:



        very good neo-con tactic, try to change the focus of the
argument, well here goes.
         
         
        i don't hate highly paid people, i am one.
         
        along with that high pay goes fiduciary responsibility.  They
clearly did NOT practice fiduciary responsibility and therefore should
NOT be highly paid and should NOT have a job.
         
        I resent highly paid people that do their job so poorly that
their banks go out of business, and then my tax dollars have to bail
them out, and they continue to be highly paid.
         
        the are incompetant and should be out of jobs, and out of money.
the got paid for a service they did not deliver, and now we taxpayers
have to make good on it.
         
        if the fair market is good for one side, let it be good for the
other.
         
        dan
         
         
         
         
         

________________________________

        From: Casey Wheeler [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:13 PM
        To: Dan Scolnick
        Cc: Mark Phillips; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: NMC - Healthcare Crisis Debate
        
        
        Why do you HATE HIGHLY PAID PEOPLE?
        
        Sent from my iPhone

        On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:58 PM, "Dan Scolnick" <
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote:
        
        

                oh pullleeze!
                 
                had the HIGH PAID bankers stuck to their fiduciary
responsibilities AND DONE THEIR JOBS,
                 
                the banks would not have failed, regardless of the
impetus the government put on them.
                 
                the government gave them incentive, the incentive was
GREED.  it was GREED for the borrowers, it was GREED for the lenders.
                 
                let's see what the outcome is.
                 
                The HIGHLY paid bankers, who were the only ones with
fiduciary responsibility, got to keep all the money they made.
                The borrowers got to live in a nice house for a little
while, and now they're out.
                We the taxpayers put in all the money,
                 
                and NOW
                 
                the HIGHLY paid bankers are buying the houses at
foreclosure to make their next killing on the same stuff.
                AND they get continued be paid far in excess of their
worth to the economy.
                in fact the worst offenders are the highest paid.
                 
                Free markets seem to only count when the oligarchy is
making their money.
                 
                dan
                 

________________________________

                From: <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Casey Wheeler
                Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:53 PM
                To: Mark Phillips
                Cc: < <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]>; < <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]>
                Subject: Re: NMC - Healthcare Crisis Debate
                
                
                No I feel that people should pay attention to things.
The banks for instance.... Had the government not forced them to lend to
so risky people, some banks would not have failed. Some would have,
sure. But that's a free market. Things need to fail. It creates new
oppurtunities. 
                Artificial limits and regulation put on most markets
slow growth and hurt competition. Adam smith was a smart man. 

                Sent from my iPhone

                On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:42 PM, "Mark Phillips" <
<mailto:[email protected]>  <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]> wrote:
                
                

                        "Free market always creates the best policy", I
disagree. The current economic climate is a testament to that.
Industries need regulation or they will continue out of control until
someone gets hurt. After that, they will continue until they get hurt or
are stopped. The really bad ones continue regardless. Think
indestructible teenager with a learner's permit, a self-centered
attitude and a high-powered Miata (I finally worked some list related
content in :-)).

                        

                        Mark

                        

                        
________________________________


                        From: <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Casey Wheeler
                        Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:19 PM
                        To: Bret Dodson
                        Cc: <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
                        Subject: Re: NMC - Healthcare Crisis Debate

                        

                        I am confident in my views, my experince and
research prove it to be correct. But, I don't think the syste

                         is without issues that need to be resolved. You
should not be able to be dropped once you contract a disease. Docotrs
should be able to prescrib exactly what the want for a patient. This
experimental stuff is BS I come across in my job as well, and as you
stated, it occurs within standard procedural operations. These as well
as the INS across state lines, tort reform etc etc would make a huge
difference in not only peoples satisfaction with the business, as well
as bring the cost down. 

                        

                        Free market always creates the best policy.  
                        
                        Sent from my iPhone

                        
                        On Sep 25, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Bret Dodso

_______________________________________________
Miatapower mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower

Reply via email to