Hi Tantek,
On Feb 2, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Ernie, if you think there are "obvious holes", document them on the
to-do
page, because to the rest of us, there are no "obvious holes", only
numerous
things we can do to improve the site.
My apologies, I didn't mean that to come across as critical as it may
have sounded. My point was rather that it seems (at least to me)
like there's several "potholes" that people new to microformats often
stumble across, and I wanted to i) gain consensus on what they are
and how to fix them, and then ii) actually fix them. At any rate,
here's my wishlist for what I'd like to see done, which (at least for
me) would be much easier at an event than on my lonesome:
----
http://microformats.org/wiki/to-do#Ernest_Prabhakar
Coalesce/prioritize existing To-Do items
Review/revise desired pathways for:
New users learning about microformats
Microformat lifecycle
Review existing specs for completeness and consistency
Identify areas of 'bitrot' or 'hole-filling'
Do it!
----
Does that make more sense?
-- Ernie P.
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
