On 2/2/06, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Review/revise desired pathways for: > New users learning about microformats > Microformat lifecycle
Indeed, it does seem that people new to microformats are often either entirely unaware of or somewhat confused about the process that exists to create a microformat. There have been a few instances of a proposal for a new microformat being sent to the list with, for example, no indication of current behavior or formats. This is not an accusation; I recall several people talking about how the microformats process is a different way of doing things, thus it is reasonable to expect people will be unfamiliar with it. Microformats-the-formats have gotten a lot of recognition, but microformats-the-process seems to be languishing a bit, when in fact they are significantly connected. I think we can do something about that. At the least, separate but clearly related (probably containing the word "micro") names to disambiguate the two concepts could be useful. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
