On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:
Hi Tantek,
On Feb 2, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Ernie, if you think there are "obvious holes", document them on
the to-do
page, because to the rest of us, there are no "obvious holes",
only numerous
things we can do to improve the site.
My apologies, I didn't mean that to come across as critical as it
may have sounded. My point was rather that it seems (at least to
me) like there's several "potholes" that people new to microformats
often stumble across, and I wanted to i) gain consensus on what
they are and how to fix them, and then ii) actually fix them. At
any rate, here's my wishlist for what I'd like to see done, which
(at least for me) would be much easier at an event than on my
lonesome:
----
http://microformats.org/wiki/to-do#Ernest_Prabhakar
Coalesce/prioritize existing To-Do items
Review/revise desired pathways for:
New users learning about microformats
Microformat lifecycle
Ah, very good topic, I was thinking about this just yesterday,
because "the process" is one view of a larger system.
Review existing specs for completeness and consistency
More eyes, fewer bugs!
Identify areas of 'bitrot' or 'hole-filling'
Do it!
----
Does that make more sense?
Yes. Thanks Ernie.
-ryan_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
