On 07/05/07, Christian Heilmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you really have to make up a new name... then how about... SHTML.
> (Short for "Semantic HTML".)
.shtml files exist.
We don't need a new name for semantically valuable HTML, we need good
tutorials explaining them. The only good HTML resource I can name when
people ask me is Patrick's HTML Dog.
I completely concur. I do not understand why HTML needs rebranding at all!
My stand-point is similar. HTML Dog is a brilliant resource, and I
suspect we should be thinking about developing resources like this to
prime for microformats. "POSH" isn't going to do that, in my mind.
--
Frances Berriman
http://fberriman.com
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
