On 07/05/07, Ara Pehlivanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/7/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > If you really have to make up a new name... then how about... SHTML. > (Short for "Semantic HTML".) > > (It's similar in vein to XHTML.) > > > SHTML is... Simple, to the point, and sexy :-)
Not sexy. HTML should be semantic all the time. There shouldn't be another category of HTML that is, and one that isn't. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
