Hello,
On 5/6/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
If you really have to make up a new name... then how about... SHTML.
(Short for "Semantic HTML".)
(It's similar in vein to XHTML.)
Sorry... I meant DHTML here.
See ya
SHTML is... Simple, to the point, and sexy :-)
See ya
On 5/6/07, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frances Berriman wrote:
>
> > This is kind of why I have a problem with the "POSH" thing.
> >
> > Yeah, it's meant to be a bit of a joke (and plenty of people are
> > laughing) - but for those people that would actually benefit from
> > improving their knowledge of HTML and semantics - seeing another
> > acronym with unknown origins thrown around isn't necessarily going to
> > make them learn any more!
>
> Also, from a marketing perspective, I'd posit that "plain" and "old" are
> probably not the best terms to sex up and sell the idea.
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
> ______________________________________________________________
> re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
> http://redux.deviantart.com
> ______________________________________________________________
> Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
> http://webstandards.org/
> ______________________________________________________________
> Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
> http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
