I suppose since the http://microformats.org/wiki/figure now exist,
would I have to bring it up here before making any changes to the
Wiki?
Using the TITLE attribute may be confusing to publishers considering
the ALT attribute is a requirement.
I do not think FIGURE and LEGEND should be set on the same element.
Hierarchy should exist.
I would instead propose:
If FIGURE contains IMAGE and LEGEND is not present, then parsers
should use the ALT attribute value for legend. This is the most basic
and common approach for <img>s today and might as well stick to it
instead of bringing TITLE into the picture.
e.g.
<div class="figure">
<img class="image" alt="The quick brown fox">
</div>
-Sarven
On 2/23/08, Toby A Inkster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sent this a couple of days ago, but was rejected from the list
> because of a problem with my subscription. Here we go again...
>
> I spent a couple of hours today summarising some of the suggestions
> people have made on the figure-examples page and condensing it down
> into a draft microformat:
>
> http://microformats.org/wiki/figure
>
> What do people think? Is it ready to go onto the drafts list or do
> you think it needs a little extra work?
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
>
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
