Hello Andy On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 21:36 +0000, Andy Mabbett wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin McEvoy > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > ><div class="figure"> > > <img class="photo" src="photo.jpeg" alt="Albert Einstein"/> > > <a rel="tag" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography";>Photo</a> > > of <cite>Albert Einstein</cite> by > > <span class="contributor vcard"> > > <span class="fn">Paul Ehrenfest</span> > > (<span class="role">photographer</span>) > > </span> > ></div> > > Doesn't Albert deserve his own vcard, too?
Do you think? is that not a bit much? would you wrap a vcard around this? "Colored drinking fountain" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ColoredDrinking.jpg > > >photo from hcard to replace image > >http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Property_List > > Not all images are photos. Let's please preserve semantics. agreed just trying to re-use ;) > > >cite is just posh > > Albert Einstein is not being cited, in the above example. If anyone is, > it's Ehrenfest. No its the contents that is the subject of a cite. > > >contributor from haudio > > There is, as yet, no hAudio to take that from, Only a draft, in which > the use of "contributor" is contentious. Also, "credit" would be more > appropriate than "contributor" for a photo agency, for example. agreed > > >I don't think legend is necessary as it seems to be acting as a > >container uF? > > Isn't legend "a key to the symbols or pictures in a map"? Anyway as it Is I think I misunderstood what "figure" was trying to do I thought it was just about annotating all images with captions or attributions. as it happens I don't think it is. Figure is just about decorative or functional images? Ignore anyway :) Thanks Martin McEvoy > _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
