In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin McEvoy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 21:36 +0000, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin McEvoy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
><div class="figure">
> <img class="photo" src="photo.jpeg" alt="Albert Einstein"/>
> <a rel="tag" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography";>Photo</a>
> of <cite>Albert Einstein</cite> by
> <span class="contributor vcard">
> <span class="fn">Paul Ehrenfest</span>
> (<span class="role">photographer</span>)
> </span>
></div>
Doesn't Albert deserve his own vcard, too?
Do you think? is that not a bit much?
Yes; and no; respectively. hCards are for "people places and venues". I
would warp all such data in an hCard (at least on the first occurrence
on the page).
would you wrap a vcard around this?
"Colored drinking fountain"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ColoredDrinking.jpg
No, because that's not a (named) person, place of venue.
[...]
Albert Einstein is not being cited, in the above example. If anyone is,
it's Ehrenfest.
No its the contents that is the subject of a cite.
I don't follow what you mean, here.
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
