In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Toby A Inkster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
I spent a couple of hours today summarising some of the suggestions
people have made on the figure-examples page and condensing it down
into a draft microformat:
>
http://microformats.org/wiki/figure
You last edit to that page was two days ago. Did you mean something
else?
What do people think? Is it ready to go onto the drafts list or do you
think it needs a little extra work?
I think that's premature and should have been on a *-brainstorming page
before a draft spec was written. Perhaps you might move it to one, where
it can be discussed and alternatives proposed?
Turning to specifics, I think the dismissal of the "include pattern" is
unfortunate and needs to be reversed (not least because text suitable
for use as a caption might be buried in a paragraph else where on the
page); and more attention needs to be paid to the proper use of "alt"
and "longdesc" attributes.
Finally I'd like to see one or more use-cases explained - what will
parsers actually /do/ with this information?
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
