> Is built-in symlinks something that y'all see as valuable, BTW? Rather
> than symlinks implemented in PHP (the 2.0 extendable record structure
> can do this quite cleanly).
Can you elaborate a bit on the 2.0 extendable records and how
this might work?
> > I don't think it presents too much of a management problem to oblige the
> > user to set these fields up manually (to be either the same as the target
> > or different),
>
> But these fields are not fixed in time. I think it would present
> somewhat
> of a management problem to oblige the user to keep track of the target
> and
> keep updating the link fields.
Well, come to think of it, probably the only field you are really likely
to want to set manually to alter sorting in a separate context is the
score. So if you're assuming that the fields of the target article are
automatically cloned onto the placeholder fields when the target
changes, I suppose you could just leave the score of the linking
article to be set manually.
Paul
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
