On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Paul Newby wrote:
> > > On the other hand, it's probably not a bad thing if
> > > this person is obliged to consult the group responsible for
> > > any referencing topics before the target disappears.
> >
> > Obliged sounds good to me, but forced not. I think the article
> > owner must be able to remove it even if it is linked to.
>
> Can't argue with that. And I don't think it's a problem
> if 'obliged' refers to a generally known principle of work
> practice or courtesy, as opposed to a technical requirement.
> But the article owner would at least need to be able to readily
> identify any persons or groups owning links to the target.
If I implement links like this there'll be functions to identify
what topics & articles link to an object. Showing these to the
user and confirmation would be in the realm of the (PHP) adminestring
site code (just like delete confirmation for the other objects
in the admin site.
Bye,
Emile
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
