> > On the other hand, it's probably not a bad thing if
> > this person is obliged to consult the group responsible for
> > any referencing topics before the target disappears.
>
> Obliged sounds good to me, but forced not. I think the article
> owner must be able to remove it even if it is linked to.
Can't argue with that. And I don't think it's a problem
if 'obliged' refers to a generally known principle of work
practice or courtesy, as opposed to a technical requirement.
But the article owner would at least need to be able to readily
identify any persons or groups owning links to the target.
Paul
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
