Doug, Like you, I know what I read. As you can see below, Bryan Bedford (FAA Administrator), as I presume the heads of most Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs), believes telling airlines/users how to operate their Billions of dollars of aircraft is a good thing. As a 45-year pilot (USAF, United, Business jets), with decades of airline operational and ATC expertise, I disagree and, if implemented, FAA’s Brand New ATC System (BNATCS) plan will increase airline costs and reduce airline quality. “We’ll tell you where we want you to be in three dimensions…and we’ll tell you where we want you to be to hit that top of descent mark to [meet] the constraints of the runway”. ( <https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/air-transport/2026-01-22/faas-bedford-provides-view-future-atc> Bryan Bedford, Washington Aero Club, Jan 22, 2026). Airlines and FAA need to turn this around to where airlines do the telling and FAA/ATC does the listening. Why does everyone want the government telling the airlines what to do?
Next, FAA’s $31.5 BNATCS plan will not reduce airline delays since it fails to focus on <https://greenlandings.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/What-Should-Airlines-Want-MTS-WINTER-2026.pdf> the root cause of delays (random Point Overloads). That said, BNATCS is a positive for equipment replacement, which is needed. FAA will never solve the airline’s delay problem by building a system that fully controls the movement of their customers aircraft. Michael xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx R. Michael Baiada cell - (303) 521-6047 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: Doug Church via Mifnet <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2026 19:11 To: [email protected] Cc: Jack Keady <[email protected]>; Doug Church <[email protected]> Subject: [Mifnet 🛰 76182] Re: Fw: Re: News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest controllable cost item Re: “BNATCS addresses none of this” How do you know? How much do you really know about what BNATCS has in store for airspace optimization other than it is not YOUR plan? Are you really saying your plan is the ONLY plan that could possibly be successful and you will not even wait to give BNATCS a chance? It’s not even built yet. Or rolled out. It’s being tested and going through the full vetting process by the competing companies. Why would you declare something a failure before you know anything about it and have not even seen it in action yet? Why not wait until passing judgment? What is the fixation on “my plan or no plan?” Where does that come from? Why is that wise? How about we all just wait and see what is possible in the coming months and years? How about we give it a chance? It’s the only chance we presently have. -Doug Church On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 9:58 PM Jack Keady via Mifnet <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Does Mr. Baiada ever move on? keady replies: Should the Wright Brothers have moved on? Should Sikorsky have moved on? Should Goddard have moved on? ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: ATHGroup--- via Mifnet <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2026 at 03:05:40 PM PDT Subject: [Mifnet 🛰 76177] Re: News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest controllable cost item Bob, Why would I move on when the task is not complete and the airline’s ”day of” operation is still dismal? 1. Airlines have delivered 30% of their customers late (A0) for the last 50 years and are happy with this result moving into the future. 2. Individual large airlines lose $5 Billion annually because of their willingness to ignore their delay problem. 3. Airlines completely and unnecessarily abdicate control over the movement of their aircraft to ATC. 4. ATC has spent $100s of Billions over the last 50 years trying to solve airline delays - and failed. 5. Now FAA wants to spend $31.5 Billion, which while helping with equipment failures, will do nothing to solve the root problem causing most delays. 6. Airline delays are just that - airline delays. Conversely, my proposed solution has been independently validated in actual airline operations by FAA, Embry-Riddle University, GE Aviation, Delta Air Lines, Georgia Tech and others at some of the world’s busiest airports, including Atlanta, Minneapolis, Detroit, Charlotte and Dubai ( <https://greenlandings.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/GreenLandings-Benefit-Summary-2023-05.pdf> GreenLandings® Benefit Summary). Next, with what part of my statements do you disagree? What have I said that is inaccurate? Have you taken the time to read even one of my papers? If so, please point to my mistake. Finally, you continually criticize my posts but have offered no solution of your own, nor, it seems, have you taken the time to even understand what I propose. Michael xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx R. Michael Baiada cell - (303) 521-6047 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: Robert S. Distler via Mifnet <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2026 14:33 To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Robert S. Distler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [Mifnet 🛰 76176] Re: News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest controllable cost item Does Mr. Baiada ever move on? Bob Distler From: ATHGroup--- via Mifnet < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 13 May, 2026 09:23 To: David Wardell < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> Cc: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Subject: [Mifnet 🛰 76157] News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest controllable cost item News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest controllable cost item. While fuel is expensive ($3.878/gal, <https://www.iata.org/en/publications/economics/fuel-monitor/> IATA 2026-05-13), and a very large line-item on an airline's balance sheet, there is a controllable airline cost that is 4 times larger. I am talking about lost aircraft productivity, which has been institutionalized into the airline's "day of" operation though the continual addition of scheduled flight/gate time buffers. Unfortunately, this is not a visible line-item cost on the airline's balance sheet, so there is minimal focus on this problem, especially since airlines incorrectly assume that this is an ATC problem. Airlines accept this as the cost of doing business - it's NOT. Airlines could internally cut their scheduled flight/gate time buffers by 50% within just a few years. The upside, along with freeing up a significant amount of aircraft productivity, is that this also reduces the airline's delays and fuel costs. ATC can't do this, FAA/NATS/Eurocontrol can't do this, only each individual airline has the internal ability to dramatically improve their "day of" production line. Airlines could. Airlines should. Airlines don't. Airline Delays - Random Point Overloads White Paper (AGIFORS, 2026-04-14) - <https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flnkd%2Ein%2FgzXJMnS8&urlhash=zEA-&mt=I6L7Mb4QOnPCn1Tr0NSIgIQRD_TjjJCuncolybNPjjrX77gZrsHHzAj-aZE0x1YRw22yeM0M4sT-5qp97pyz5Aj7FJ7fjAUFUYKrrgKO6pCf01Ihvu5qU-Pn&isSdui=true> https://lnkd.in/gzXJMnS8 Who Controls the Movement of the Aircraft? (Leeham News, 2026-03-31) - <https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flnkd%2Ein%2FghuXRbCy&urlhash=l8cW&mt=tTzPYTRmeP8VM7MRmi1_80qk4mbHq7pDB2Up5vq8bm_463UIrwpeW4TSJ4Z5zrt909Qu-M1I6WgxitIZFKNQ2SC7WDEpvkPLy-jzA8HAppqLvfZEtZbtwpDx&isSdui=true> https://lnkd.in/ghuXRbCy What Airlines Should Want? (MTS, Winter, 2026) - <https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flnkd%2Ein%2FgCpnAamr&urlhash=Ri43&mt=_NTTBsxQX0Byz_LlDJzhLlNjECoTwgFIXNVawCs7b7HEU_S4n9LOyX_icwvNt_LiQvHoqQuERPdEmK48r0SG1TYqZq-AT9IF2eSGvVRnfxStwOrPpO33iZSI&isSdui=true> https://lnkd.in/gCpnAamr Michael xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx R. Michael Baiada cell - (303) 521-6047 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Revised: 20250507 You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list. The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please know that it would be greatly appreciated: https://wardell.us/url/mifbit All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies: 1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a right. 2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author. 3) The tone of discussions is collegial. 4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste. 5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other Mifnet members. * The Mifnet WEB SITE is: https://www.mifnet.com/ * To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit: https://lists.mifnet.com/ OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: [email protected]?subject=leave * Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to: [email protected] * You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at: [email protected] * Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list traffic into 1-3 messages daily. See instructions at: https://lists.mifnet.com/ * Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at: https://lists.mifnet.com/ * For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: [email protected]?subject=help * View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at: https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies * View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at: https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems * View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at: https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/
