Bob,
 
Please provide an example of what part of my proposal won’t work. What did I 
say that is inaccurate? Please be specific.
 
Also, FAA has been proposing variations of the same theme (more ATC control) 
through decades of effort and $100s of Billions of programs to fix airline 
delays without success, yet I have yet to hear you complain.
 
For example, GDP, SWAP Routes, weather reroutes, SIDS, Miles-in-trail, altitude 
changes, speed adjustments, STARS, vectors, long finals, slots, airspace 
redesign, MLS, AAS, ISSS, RNAV, Fans, GPS, FreeFlight, RNP, ADS-B/C, CPDLC, 
ERAM, TBFM, Trajectory Based Ops, CDM, NextGen, etc., none of which have 
produced the desired result
 
Maybe you should reexamine the focus of your criticism, since it is FAA that 
has failed over and over again, not me.
 
Also, I have found nowhere in the Controller’s Handbook (7110.65BB) that says 
ATC is responsible to make airlines/users efficient or that Controllers are 
required to control the aircraft at all times, which is what FAA Administrator 
Bryan Bedford proposes (“We’ll tell you where we want you to be in three 
dimensions…and we’ll tell you where we want you to be to hit that top of 
descent mark to [meet] the constraints of the runway”. ( 
<https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/air-transport/2026-01-22/faas-bedford-provides-view-future-atc>
 Aero Club, Jan 22, 2026). 
 
What the Controller Handbook does say is:
 
2−1−1. ATC SERVICE
a. The primary purpose of the ATC system is to prevent a collision involving 
aircraft operating in the system.
b. In addition to its primary purpose, the ATC system also:
1. Provides a safe, orderly, and expeditious flow of air traffic.
2. Supports National Security and Homeland Defense missions.
 
Finally, when it comes to airline delays, my solution works and provides 
independently validated positive results, something FAA can’t say after 50 
years of effort.
 
Michael
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
R. Michael Baiada
cell - (303) 521-6047
 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
 
From: Robert S. Distler via Mifnet <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2026 15:56
To: [email protected]
Cc: Robert S. Distler <[email protected]>
Subject: [Mifnet 🛰 76178] Re: News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest 
controllable cost item
 
Michael,
 
Did you ever hear the one about the guy who made the same mistake on a computer 
time and again, but was surprised that he got the same response?
 
In more than twenty years, you’ve been posting variations on the same theme.  
You might consider moving onto another subject.
 
Bob Distler 
 
 
From: ATHGroup--- via Mifnet <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, 16 May, 2026 15:05
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [Mifnet 🛰 76177] Re: News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest 
controllable cost item
 
Bob,
 
Why would I move on when the task is not complete and the airline’s ”day of” 
operation is still dismal?
 
1.      Airlines have delivered 30% of their customers late (A0) for the last 
50 years and are happy with this result moving into the future.
2.      Individual large airlines lose $5 Billion annually because of their 
willingness to ignore their delay problem.
3.      Airlines completely and unnecessarily abdicate control over the 
movement of their aircraft to ATC.
4.      ATC has spent $100s of Billions over the last 50 years trying to solve 
airline delays - and failed.
5.      Now FAA wants to spend $31.5 Billion, which while helping with 
equipment failures, will do nothing to solve the root problem causing most 
delays.
6.      Airline delays are just that - airline delays.
 
Conversely, my proposed solution has been independently validated in actual 
airline operations by FAA, Embry-Riddle University, GE Aviation, Delta Air 
Lines, Georgia Tech and others at some of the world’s busiest airports, 
including Atlanta, Minneapolis, Detroit, Charlotte and Dubai ( 
<https://greenlandings.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/GreenLandings-Benefit-Summary-2023-05.pdf>
 GreenLandings® Benefit Summary).
 
Next, with what part of my statements do you disagree? What have I said that is 
inaccurate? Have you taken the time to read even one of my papers? If so, 
please point to my mistake.
 
Finally, you continually criticize my posts but have offered no solution of 
your own, nor, it seems, have you taken the time to even understand what I 
propose.
 
Michael
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
R. Michael Baiada
cell - (303) 521-6047
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
 
From: Robert S. Distler via Mifnet <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2026 14:33
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Cc: Robert S. Distler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: [Mifnet 🛰 76176] Re: News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest 
controllable cost item
 
Does Mr. Baiada ever move on?
 
Bob Distler 
 
 
From: ATHGroup--- via Mifnet <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: Wednesday, 13 May, 2026 09:23
To: David Wardell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [Mifnet 🛰 76157] News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest 
controllable cost item
 
News Flash - Fuel is not the airlines largest controllable cost item.

While fuel is expensive ($3.878/gal, IATA 2026-05-13 
<https://www.iata.org/en/publications/economics/fuel-monitor/> ), and a very 
large line-item on an airline's balance sheet, there is a controllable airline 
cost that is 4 times larger.

I am talking about lost aircraft productivity, which has been institutionalized 
into the airline's "day of" operation though the continual addition of 
scheduled flight/gate time buffers.

Unfortunately, this is not a visible line-item cost on the airline's balance 
sheet, so there is minimal focus on this problem, especially since airlines 
incorrectly assume that this is an ATC problem.

Airlines accept this as the cost of doing business - it's NOT.

Airlines could internally cut their scheduled flight/gate time buffers by 50% 
within just a few years. The upside, along with freeing up a significant amount 
of aircraft productivity, is that this also reduces the airline's delays and 
fuel costs.

ATC can't do this, FAA/NATS/Eurocontrol can't do this, only each individual 
airline has the internal ability to dramatically improve their "day of" 
production line.

Airlines could. Airlines should. Airlines don't.

Airline Delays - Random Point Overloads White Paper (AGIFORS, 2026-04-14) - 
https://lnkd.in/gzXJMnS8 
<https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flnkd%2Ein%2FgzXJMnS8&urlhash=zEA-&mt=I6L7Mb4QOnPCn1Tr0NSIgIQRD_TjjJCuncolybNPjjrX77gZrsHHzAj-aZE0x1YRw22yeM0M4sT-5qp97pyz5Aj7FJ7fjAUFUYKrrgKO6pCf01Ihvu5qU-Pn&isSdui=true>
 

Who Controls the Movement of the Aircraft? (Leeham News, 2026-03-31) - 
https://lnkd.in/ghuXRbCy 
<https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flnkd%2Ein%2FghuXRbCy&urlhash=l8cW&mt=tTzPYTRmeP8VM7MRmi1_80qk4mbHq7pDB2Up5vq8bm_463UIrwpeW4TSJ4Z5zrt909Qu-M1I6WgxitIZFKNQ2SC7WDEpvkPLy-jzA8HAppqLvfZEtZbtwpDx&isSdui=true>
 

What Airlines Should Want? (MTS, Winter, 2026) - https://lnkd.in/gCpnAamr 
<https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flnkd%2Ein%2FgCpnAamr&urlhash=Ri43&mt=_NTTBsxQX0Byz_LlDJzhLlNjECoTwgFIXNVawCs7b7HEU_S4n9LOyX_icwvNt_LiQvHoqQuERPdEmK48r0SG1TYqZq-AT9IF2eSGvVRnfxStwOrPpO33iZSI&isSdui=true>
 
 
Michael
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
R. Michael Baiada
cell - (303) 521-6047
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised: 20250507

You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list.

The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly 
cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please 
know that it would be greatly appreciated:
https://wardell.us/url/mifbit

All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies:

1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a 
right.
2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author.
3) The tone of discussions is collegial.
4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste.
5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other 
Mifnet members.

* The Mifnet WEB SITE is:
  https://www.mifnet.com/

* To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/
  OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: [email protected]?subject=leave

* Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to:
  [email protected]

* You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at:
  [email protected]

* Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list 
traffic into 1-3
  messages daily. See instructions at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email:
  [email protected]?subject=help

* View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies

* View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems

* View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/

Reply via email to