No NAT Inspection would be whatever is needed to identify traffic in a firewall rule, mangle and add DSCP value to the streams.
So in the RB world, a 1000 would be the minimum, and then any appliance that does passthrough which would likely cost more than RB1000 and I'm pretty sure the RB1000 would be sufficient performance wise. Thanks! Dylan On Apr 22, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Chupaka wrote: > 1) NAT? Queues? > 2) the first RB that can passthrough 2 ports is RB1000, afair > 3) what kind of inspection and analysis? > 4) any RouterOS-based system =) > > 2011/4/22 Dylan Bouterse <[email protected]> > >> I'm interested in putting a MT device in place for a couple of reasons. >> I'll try to be as descriptive as possible. I'm looking for a recommendation >> on the cheapest (damn budget) solution to achieve what I'm looking for. >> >> Needs to process 50-100Mb of traffic. >> Prefer passthrough ports in case device loses power. >> Will be inspecting traffic and doing protocol analysis. >> Mangling traffic based on src/dst IP and changing/adding DSCP values. >> >> Is that enough for a recommendation? >> >> Dylan >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110422/c8be2361/attachment.html> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
