Great info/stats Andrew. Thank you!

Dylan

On Apr 23, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Andrew Cox wrote:

> I gotta go with Josh on this, as far as bang for buck goes at the moment,
> there's nothing in the RB world even close to what an x86 device can put out
> for roughly twice the cost of an RB1100
> Plus you can get a box with IPMI in case you ever break anything badly .. or
> a Mikrotik update does :-P
> 
> We have an Intel 2ghz Quad Core 1RU box pushing up to 100Mbps of traffic
> (with a large QoS tree) that hits a maximum of 28% CPU at the moment,
> servicing around 500~ hotspot users daily.
> (before anyone asks, it's running multi-cpu=yes and that's an average across
> all 4 cores, however normally 1 core sits about 2-5% higher than the others
> due to some mikrotik processes lacking multi-threaded capabilities at this
> time)
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Andrew Cox
> 
> On 22 April 2011 23:51, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> X86 is cheaper and more powerful.  Large number of ports is really the only
>> catch.
>> On Apr 22, 2011 10:17 AM, "Dylan Bouterse" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Is there a common thread to the issues with the 1xxx models? I'm assuming
>> it's a hardware thing, but I've heard people on both sides of the fence.
>> Some say they're crap, others say they've had them in service since they
>> came out and have had no issues. The track record isn't good overall, but
>> if
>> there's some commonality to the issues, it's worth weighing in to the
>> decision considering the price vs. a purpose built appliance that will do
>> passthrough.
>>> 
>>> Dylan
>>> 
>>> On Apr 22, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I don't trust those 1xxx models and would use x86. A garage sale PC
>> would
>>>> be more reliable IMO.
>>>> 
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Dylan Bouterse <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> No NAT
>>>>> Inspection would be whatever is needed to identify traffic in a
>> firewall
>>>>> rule, mangle and add DSCP value to the streams.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So in the RB world, a 1000 would be the minimum, and then any appliance
>>>>> that does passthrough which would likely cost more than RB1000 and I'm
>>>>> pretty sure the RB1000 would be sufficient performance wise.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dylan
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 22, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Chupaka wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1) NAT? Queues?
>>>>>> 2) the first RB that can passthrough 2 ports is RB1000, afair
>>>>>> 3) what kind of inspection and analysis?
>>>>>> 4) any RouterOS-based system =)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2011/4/22 Dylan Bouterse <[email protected]>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm interested in putting a MT device in place for a couple of
>> reasons.
>>>>>>> I'll try to be as descriptive as possible. I'm looking for a
>>>>> recommendation
>>>>>>> on the cheapest (damn budget) solution to achieve what I'm looking
>> for.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Needs to process 50-100Mb of traffic.
>>>>>>> Prefer passthrough ports in case device loses power.
>>>>>>> Will be inspecting traffic and doing protocol analysis.
>>>>>>> Mangling traffic based on src/dst IP and changing/adding DSCP values.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is that enough for a recommendation?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dylan
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>>> URL: <
>>>>> 
>> 
>> http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110422/c8be2361/attachment.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>> 
>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>> 
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL: <
>> 
>> http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110422/f5d791b6/attachment.html
>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>> 
>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> RouterOS
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>> 
>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> RouterOS
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110422/e3576ec4/attachment.html
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mikrotik mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>> 
>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> RouterOS
>> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110424/b0938d20/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
> 
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS

_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik

Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS

Reply via email to