Slip, Please tell me you copied and pasted that. I can't imagine how long that would have taken you to write otherwise.
On Feb 7, 10:29 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess the answer is no, KC, so let me explain; > > Such number as may be deemed necessary to perform the stated task in a > timely and efficient manner within the strictures of the following > agreement. Whereas the party of the first part, also known as 'the > lawyers' and the party of the second part, also known as 'the light > bulb' do hereby agree to a transaction wherein the party of the second > part (light bulb) shall be removed from the current position as a > result of failure to perform previously agreed upon duties, i.e. the > lighting, elucidation, and otherwise illumination of the area ranging > from the front (North) door, through the entryway, terminating at an > area just through the primary living area, demarcated by the beginning > of the carpet, any spillover illumination being at the option of the > party of the second part (light bulb) and not required by the > aforementioned agreement between the parties. The aforementioned > removal transaction shall include, but not be limited to, the > following steps: > > 1. The party of the first part (lawyer) shall, with or without > elevation at his option, by means of a chair, step stool, ladder or > any other means of elevation, grasp the party of the second part > (light bulb) and rotate the party of the second part (light bulb) in a > counter clockwise direction, said direction being non-negotiable. Said > grasping and rotation of the party of the second part (light bulb) > shall be undertaken by the party of the first part (lawyer) to > maintain the structural integrity of the party of the second part > (light bulb), notwithstanding the aforementioned failure of the party > of the second part (light bulb) to perform the customary and agreed > upon duties. The foregoing notwithstanding, however, both parties > stipulate that structural failure of the party of the second part > (light bulb) may be incidental to the aforementioned failure to > perform and in such case the party of the first part (lawyer) shall be > held blameless for such structural failure insofar as the non- > negotiable directional codicil (counter-clockwise) is observed by the > party of the first part (lawyer) throughout. > > 2. Upon reaching a point where the party of the second part (light > bulb) becomes separated from the party of the third part > ('receptacle'), the party of the first part shall have the option of > disposing of the party of the second part (light bulb) in a manner > consistent with all applicable state, local, and federal statutes. > > 3. Once seperation and disposal have been achieved, the party of the > first part (lawyer) shall have the option of beginning the > installation of the party of the fourth part ('new light bulb'). This > installation shall occur in a manner consistent with the reverse > procedures described in step one of this self same document, being > careful to note that the rotation should occur in a clockwise > direction, said direction also being non-negotiable and only until the > party of the fourth part (new light bulb) becomes snug in the party of > the third part (receptacle) and in fact becomes the party of the > second part (light bulb). > > Note: The above described steps may be performed, at the option of the > party of the first part (lawyer), by said party of the first part > (lawyer), or by his or her heirs and assigns, or by any and all > persons authorized by him or her to do same the objective being to > produce a level of illumination in the immediate vicinity of the > aforementioned front (North) door consistent with maximization of > ingress and revenue for the party of the fifth part, also known as > 'The Firm'. > > On Feb 7, 8:39 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Do you know how many lawyers it takes to change a light bulb KC? > > > On Feb 7, 4:09 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Ok Slip, I don't know if your joking now or not, so I'll let you know, > > > I was joking. I thought my sarcasm and humor was pretty thick, but > > > maybe not. > > > > On Feb 7, 3:07 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You know I was thinking it too? Wow! > > > > > Truthfully, I was not thinking any such thing not even remotely, get > > > > a grip my friend! > > > > > Perhaps this is self revealing and something that you should examine > > > > about yourself. > > > > > Paranoia is a bad thing KC. > > > > > On Feb 7, 3:55 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I was only replying to your comment because you identified the author, > > > > > my comment was really aimed at Fran. BUT I know you were thinking it > > > > > too. > > > > > > On Feb 7, 2:53 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > How do you perceive my identification of the quote as any > > > > > > implication?? > > > > > > > Are you implying something about me? > > > > > > > On Feb 7, 3:39 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > So is the implication that I am a Nazi? > > > > > > > > On Feb 7, 2:32 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's from Hitler’s Zweites Buch. > > > > > > > > > On Feb 7, 3:19 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nope. > > > > > > > > > > On 7 Feb., 21:51, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > victor david hanson? > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 2:45 PM, frantheman > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7 Feb., 01:29, frantheman > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> Nietzsche was a genius, and very troubled man. He can be > > > > > > > > > > >> mined for all > > > > > > > > > > >> sorts of ideas and inspirations and much of it is > > > > > > > > > > >> misrepresentational. > > > > > > > > > > >> Personally, I've never been convinced of his > > > > > > > > > > >> glorification of Homeric > > > > > > > > > > >> Greece and Sparta, as well as his working of the > > > > > > > > > > >> master-slave theme, > > > > > > > > > > >> although others have found it inspiring: > > > > > > > > > > > >> "At one time the Spartans were capable of such a wise > > > > > > > > > > >> measure, but not > > > > > > > > > > >> our present, mendaciously sentimental, bourgeois > > > > > > > > > > >> patriotic nonsense. > > > > > > > > > > >> The rule of six thousand Spartans over three hundred and > > > > > > > > > > >> fifty > > > > > > > > > > >> thousand Helots was only thinkable in consequence of the > > > > > > > > > > >> high racial > > > > > > > > > > >> value of the Spartans. But this was the result of a > > > > > > > > > > >> systematic race > > > > > > > > > > >> preservation; thus Sparta must be regarded as the first > > > > > > > > > > >> Völkisch > > > > > > > > > > >> State. The exposure of sick, weak, deformed children, in > > > > > > > > > > >> short their > > > > > > > > > > >> destruction, was more decent and in truth a thousand > > > > > > > > > > >> times more humane > > > > > > > > > > >> than the wretched insanity of our day which preserves > > > > > > > > > > >> the most > > > > > > > > > > >> pathological subject, and indeed at any price, and yet > > > > > > > > > > >> takes the life > > > > > > > > > > >> of a hundred thousand healthy children in consequence of > > > > > > > > > > >> birth control > > > > > > > > > > >> or through abortions, in order subsequently to breed a > > > > > > > > > > >> race of > > > > > > > > > > >> degenerates burdened with illnesses." > > > > > > > > > > > >> Three guesses who wrote that, as well as the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > I may not have expressed this clearly. The author was NOT > > > > > > > > > > > Nietzsche. > > > > > > > > > > > >> "But for the coming of Christianity, who knows how the > > > > > > > > > > >> history of > > > > > > > > > > >> Europe would have developed? Rome would have conquered > > > > > > > > > > >> all Europe, and > > > > > > > > > > >> the onrush of the Huns would have been broken on the > > > > > > > > > > >> legions. It was > > > > > > > > > > >> Christianity that brought about the fall of Rome—not the > > > > > > > > > > >> Germans or > > > > > > > > > > >> the Huns. What Bolshevism is achieving to-day on the > > > > > > > > > > >> materialist and > > > > > > > > > > >> technical level, Christianity had achieved on the > > > > > > > > > > >> metaphysical level. > > > > > > > > > > >> When the Crown sees the throne totter, it needs the > > > > > > > > > > >> support of the > > > > > > > > > > >> masses." > > > > > > > > > > > >> Francis > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 6 Feb., 23:32, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Fran, > > > > > > > > > > >> > I really don't have much of a philosophy that I'm > > > > > > > > > > >> > seriously committed > > > > > > > > > > >> > to. More or less I just like to get riled up. I WISH > > > > > > > > > > >> > I was committed > > > > > > > > > > >> > to a philosophy, or a view of the world. If pushed, I > > > > > > > > > > >> > do get quite > > > > > > > > > > >> > sick of the world though that you espouse. I long for > > > > > > > > > > >> > the type of > > > > > > > > > > >> > society that Nietzsche speaks of. He spoke so very > > > > > > > > > > >> > highly of pre- > > > > > > > > > > >> > Socratic greece. Society such as Sparta, and > > > > > > > > > > >> > pre-Socratic Athens. > > > > > > > > > > >> > Those were cultures that gloried in strength. They > > > > > > > > > > >> > didn't adopt the > > > > > > > > > > >> > slave mentality that Christianity has heaped upon us > > > > > > > > > > >> > all. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Its so popular now for us to speak so badly of > > > > > > > > > > >> > Christianity, and yet > > > > > > > > > > >> > what we don't realize is that the world is by and > > > > > > > > > > >> > large Christian, > > > > > > > > > > >> > whether they know it or not. No of course they don't > > > > > > > > > > >> > say they believe > > > > > > > > > > >> > in Jesus. No, they don't read the Bible. No, they > > > > > > > > > > >> > probably don't > > > > > > > > > > >> > even believe in God. But as far as philosophy and > > > > > > > > > > >> > world view goes, > > > > > > > > > > >> > they are died in the wool Christian. Its the > > > > > > > > > > >> > Judeo-Christian world > > > > > > > > > > >> > view that Nietzsche pointed out gives birth to > > > > > > > > > > >> > Nihilism. Judeo- > > > > > > > > > > >> > Christian world view is based on slave mentality. It > > > > > > > > > > >> > breeds a culture > > > > > > > > > > >> > of weaklings. Those who would otherwise be strong and > > > > > > > > > > >> > powerful and > > > > > > > > > > >> > contribute to a strong and powerful culture, they get > > > > > > > > > > >> > driven down into > > > > > > > > > > >> > the dust by slave morality, and everyone is equally > > > > > > > > > > >> > pathetic. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > This is what I am on about today. If you want the > > > > > > > > > > >> > honest truth, Bush > > > > > > > > > > >> > was an evangelical Christian, and was part of > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
