"... On Feb 5, 4:04 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: ..."

> I wish we could look deeper into the structures that have brought
> about this mess.  I like the idea of small and local-global for most
> things as I don't cotton to the idea that whizz-kids know much other
> than how to use and hide insider information.  Obama was sliming up to
> the ghastly Blair yesterday and this makes me wonder whether he just
> has a sharp eye to what sounds good rather than policies.  Capitalism
> readjusts itself as a rule and I think this will be the problem - the
> same old stuff will emerge again when we really need deeper change
> towards more justice in law and reward.

I think we can and have looked deeper into the current economic crisis
and I think it scares the hell out of us but that's no reason for any
of us to go into mental and spiritual rigor mortis over it.

>From the bottom up, fear and greed are the altogether underlying
causes of the current situation.  It helps to remember that greed is
but one of the bastard children of fear.

It started with the housing market, as it generally seems to -- we
have more bubble/bust cycles in real estate than in all the rest of
business and industry combined.  Perhaps that is because land is the
primary and underlying foundation of what we consider to be wealth,
leading us to value and over-value it more than is meet and proper.

Of course it doesn't help that real estate salespeople are held in
little more esteem than used car salespeople which fosters the
attitude that since they have the name they might as well play the
game.  In any case, real estate blossomed into another bubble that led
to the greatest over-valuation of property that this nation has ever
seen.

This mess was made worse by an out of touch administration that set
loose the dogs of greed and the dogs of war by reducing or eliminating
virtually all controls over the market.  Then the banks and mortgage
houses got in on the bubble by giving overvalued mortgages under
obscene terms to people who could not be expected to pay them off.
The people who are now in foreclosure or close too it are screaming
but most of them knew or should have known they were in over their
heads and should have stopped.  But a large number of them figured,
what the hell, I'll flip this property in two years at a handsome
profit given the current rate of appreciation, so I don't care if the
mortgage balloons to an outragous rate.  The problem began to come to
the surface about two years ago when the appreciation rate began to
fall, then the bottom fell out of it last September.

A lot of people got into the market early on in the boom and wound up
taking their profits early and walking while the walking was good.
It's sort of like the initial investors in a ponzi scheme -- they are
the only ones who will realize any profit or return on their
investment and that profit will be paid for by those who are the
losers on the end run.  The ones who got into the market in the last
two years have virtually lost everything.  The bigger problem is that
as the real estate market went bust it fell so low that it took a lot
of very solid homeowners with it -- people who did not really deserve
to lose.

But also early on the banks and mortgage companies, seeing this huge
influx of money and growth, packaged these overvalued mortgages into
more and more complex investment packages which were then sold
repackaged and resold over and over to other banks and investment
houses on thinner and thinner margins until those investments were so
complex and so leveraged that no one could figure out who owned what
and how much any of it was really worth.  These comprise what are
currently referred to as toxic assets

And these toxic assets are the problem the banks have to deal with
today.  There are so many of these overvalued assets on their books
that they have no idea whether they are insolvent (bankrupt) or not
and are holding on to every dime they get from any source including
the bailout funds.  This is also why everyone is talking about needing
to fund the banks with additional trillions more dollars.

Without banks the country has no liquidity and that more than anything
else can bring about ruin.  No one likes bankers -- probably not even
other bankers -- but they are necessary to a functioning economy
whether we like it or not.

Capitalism is the process whereby capital is invested to create
profits.  Every one who owns a share of anything in this country is a
capitalist.  It is also true that a capitalist free market does get
out of balance from time to time -- either via over-valuing or under-
valuing assets by different means but mostly by debt exceeding the
necessary growth to pay the interest and reduce the principle on that
debt.

Debt is a fine tool to be used with a steady hand to make the economy
grow, but again, where it gets out of balance with an economy's
ability to grow fast enough to service the debt and principle the
waters get troubled.

And unfortunately when the waters get troubled people's fears are
magnified and greed becomes even more prevalent.  This is where we are
right now.

But there is a bigger problem to deal with, though not an
insurmountable one.  Basically no one ever envisioned a global economy
such as we have today.  Many call it Pandora's box but maybe Pandora's
not such a nasty bitch after all.  Time will tell but what we have is
not only a new ballgame, but a whole new game entirely and we are
unsure of the degree and sort of rules necessary to ensure against
greed and corruption without choking the economy to death.

We know people become afraid and react greedily but how do we protect
ourselves, our society, and our economy from that greed and corruption
without creating a stringently and tightly controlled environment that
does not permit any growth at all.  It is true, as Geithner said the
other day -- the same day Wall Street and other markets took a
nosedive on the news -- that we are in uncharted waters and need to
proceed with both care and daring -- a difficult trick at best.

But the numbers can help give the confidence needed.  Global wealth --
assets if  you will -- is estimated to be around $140 trillion with
the U.S. owning the largest share at approximately $48 trillion.
Notwithstanding the current situation, the global annual GDP (the
value of all goods and services) is around $48 trillion, which
accounts for a certain amount of growth in global assets each year.
The U.S. adds  approximately $12 trillion a year to that.  In both
assets and GDP we still lead the world by a wide margin.  Check out
http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2007/01/worlds_assets_h.html
for a more detailed graphic on these numbers.

But the essence of this situation is that it is entirely of human
creation.  Nature did not force an economy on us.  Were we satisfied
to live as the rest of the animal kingdom lives, we'd never have to
face anything worse than a natural disaster.  But we have created this
world in which we function.  It is all our own doing.  We write the
rules and arbitrate the outcomes.  Basically we got ourselves into
this mess and given our history, I've little doubt we'll get ourselves
out of it and be the better for it.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to