This is not an answer to any of the above posts.  It's a new issue and
I have to say, you Brits can sure dream up some realistically scary
scenarios.  Consider this from the ...

Financial Times
London, November 2012: a dystopian dream
By Gideon Rachman
February 16 2009 19:27

On both sides of the Atlantic, senior officials are issuing dire
warnings about global political turmoil. In the US, Admiral Dennis
Blair, the director of national intelligence, says instability
produced by the economic crisis is now the biggest short-term threat
to US national security. In Britain, Ed Balls, a cabinet minister,
argues that the financial crisis is "more serious" than that of the
1930s, adding cheerfully: "And we all remember how the politics of
that era were shaped by the economy."

All this is alarming - but also rather vague. So how might world
politics look in four years’ time? Something like this, perhaps . . .

It is November 7 2012. At three in the morning, an exhausted-looking
President Barack Obama appears before weeping supporters in the
ballroom of the Chicago Hilton and concedes defeat. The euphoria of
his victory-night speech in Grant Park four years earlier is a distant
memory. The Obama administration has been overwhelmed by America’s
economic problems. Sarah Palin is the new president of the US.

Elected on a ticket of populism at home and nationalism overseas,
President-elect Palin starts to take congratulatory phone calls from
foreign leaders. First on the line is Avigdor Lieberman, the prime
minister of Israel; then comes President Vladimir Putin of Russia.
Five different leaders claiming to speak in the name of the European
Union try to place calls - but they are all put on hold. As for the
Chinese leadership, the new president is not speaking to them. How
could she, after she has campaigned against the "communist currency
manipulators of Beijing"?

The Chinese have resisted the temptation to call Mrs Palin a
"capitalist running dog". But Maoist language is creeping back into
Chinese official discourse, as the country struggles to adjust to the
collapse and closure of its export markets. Alarmed by the large
number of unemployed in the cities, the Communist party has abandoned
plans to privatise rural land and invested heavily in public works in
the countryside and new collective farms. This policy is swiftly
dubbed "the Great Leap backwards".

The world event that had most damaged Mr Obama was Iran’s successful
test of a nuclear weapon in 2011. The Republicans had hammered home
their message that Mr Obama was "a second Jimmy Carter", who had been
duped by hopes of striking a grand bargain with Iran.

The Iranian nuclear test had also driven Israeli politics even further
to the right and set the stage for the rise of Mr Lieberman. His
campaign slogan in the 2011 election - "bomb them while they are on
the toilet " - was borrowed from Mr Putin and chanted gleefully by Mr
Lieberman’s Russian-speaking supporters.

Mr Obama had successfully delivered on his campaign promise to get
America out of Iraq. But by 2012, the voters were taking that for
granted. Nato’s messy withdrawal from Afghanistan had, however,
damaged him. The US and its allies had left behind a country run by a
patchwork of more or less co-operative warlords. The new anti-terror
strategy was officially called "watch and strike", and unofficially
dubbed "whack a mole". It involved monitoring potential terrorist
camps from a distance and bombing them.

Mr Putin had said that he had no intention of gloating about
Afghanistan, before adding: "But the age of American arrogance is
over."

By 2010, Mr Putin was safely installed back in the Kremlin. The
gravity of Russia’s economic crisis had led the official media to
clamour for a return to strong leadership. President Dmitry Medvedev
had taken the hint in early 2010 and stepped aside. His arrest the
following year came as an unpleasant surprise.

In 2011, the unstable democratic governments in Ukraine and Georgia
had fallen, after weeks of popular unrest. The Russians were suspected
of orchestrating events but nobody could prove anything. The Americans
and Europeans had protested - but only feebly. Privately, many western
diplomats argued that only Mr Putin stood between Russia and fascism.

After the fall of the Merkel government in 2009, Germany was governed
by a succession of unstable coalitions and forgettable chancellors.
The hope that had accompanied the election of David Cameron as
Britain’s prime minister, under the slogan "let the sunshine in", had
swiftly disappeared. The hapless Mr Cameron was now the most unpopular
prime minister in British history.

This left President Nicolas Sarkozy of France as the dominant figure
in the EU. His divorce from Carla Bruni and marriage to Madonna had
only briefly distracted him.

Mr Sarkozy had weathered the denunciations that followed his decision
in 2010 formally to withdraw France from the EU’s regimes on
competition and state aid. All main French banks and industrial
conglomerates were instructed to make 90 per cent of their investments
at home. Mr Sarkozy’s move was widely denounced across the EU - but
then equally widely imitated.

At home, the French president was under pressure to go even further in
a nationalist direction from his main political opponents - "the
postman and the housewife" -, otherwise known as Olivier Besancenot, a
Trotskyite, and Marine Le Pen of the far-right National Front. Ms Le
Pen cited the rise of Sarah Palin as an inspiration.

As the morning of November 7 wore on, President Palin herself took to
the stage in Anchorage, Alaska. Her supporters cheered and waved ice
hockey sticks. "I’ve got a message for the mullahs and the commies,"
she roared: "America is back."

[email protected]
Post and read comments at Gideon Rachman’s blog
More columns at www.ft.com/gideonrachman
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to