I think the termination of immigration, at least until some semblance of workability and viability is in focus, makes all the sense in the world. The rampant influx of immigrants stifles the process and stagnates the intention. Assimilation is a process that can't be overrun by a bloated immigrant populous. I don't see why there hasn't been some sort of qualifier for immigrants, especially as Orn puts it, the religious fanatic types. It seems people just show up at your door and you have to just let them in, I don't get it. There must be some strict limitations put into place to prevent undesirable immigrants from staying on board, I mean there must be some benefit to discrimination. Are we becoming powerless over immigration right?
Simply, there is only so much room on a life boat and then some but sooner or later some must be left to drown or the whole boat will go under. On Apr 1, 4:42 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Vam - though I'd say Islam is a religion pretending > peace, something attractive until one realises one is amongst 'chosen > people'. Muslims can be as generous as any other group and they are > not alone in trying to force their manners down other's throats. > France has many more Muslims than other EU countries and they are a > small minority in the UK - yet this small minority is causing much > trouble and fear. Multi-culturalism gets close to apartheid. We > should also note that we dump these problems into areas already short > of resources and should hardly be surprised when the reactions look > racist - what would we be doing if the only houses available to us and > our children were taken out of our resource pot or if our sleep was > being disturbed by banging car doors at Mosque call? I suspect, on a > religious basis, that if we had medieval Xtian preaching we'd be as > disturbed by that as we are by some Islam - so it may be a mistake to > think this is a religious problem. > I''m now in favour of the EU preventing any further immigration and > seeking to build a new welfare state based on work contributions (with > exceptions) and the availability of work. We should set a target for > assimilation (10 years) - by all of us - to new democratic standards > in politics, work and society. > > On 1 Apr, 00:35, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You know Don, I haven't been able to shake that piece on Muslims > > pushing for government positions, mainly because I've always > > understood a precept of "Separation of Church and State", however it > > seems that is not really what is going on. In fact, I remember > > several articles concerning the Bush comments about God wanted him to > > be President. Obviously there really is Not any separation but more > > so an inside opportunity to manipulate government policy. I remember > > reading about hard core right wing legislative votes going against > > environmental issues based on the "belief" that the world was going to > > end soon anyway so why waste money on saving the earth. I can't stand > > religious nonsense of that sort or any religious nonsense period. It > > is as it has always been, behind every good war is a good religion. > > > On Mar 31, 8:45 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Muslims are not a > > > > > popular scenario. that is for sure, > > > > Allan > > > > Ah, but here in America we welcome them. Check out this gem from > > > yesterday. > > > >http://www.e-thepeople.org/article/6404101/view > > > > It just keeps getting scarier. I've heard Obama want's the Gitmo > > > terrorists released into the general population. I assume that is > > > what will eventually happen if we try to give them Citizens rights and > > > a trial by jury. We'll almost certainly have to cut them lose. There > > > is already precedent for this. > > > > dj > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:52 AM, iam deheretic <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > I do agree there is a sever potential for trouble, and it lays > > > > hidden, as > > > > I do have a friend that did take the time to learn Arabic,, he is still > > > > learning it,, for his law practice.. and there is no easy way to read > > > > it.. > > > > so how do you really know what is being said.. > > > > > Though I do think it is one of the most beautiful languages form an > > > > artistic > > > > point of view ,, I don't trust what i can not read.. > > > > > the other problem I have is what I have read makes very little sense,, > > > > and > > > > seems to be very distorted, and not integrating with in the existing > > > > culture. being separate from society maintaining a their own world. > > > > Today > > > > to enter our country you have to speak dutch and it is not an easy test. > > > > Though speak a little dutch I am exempted from the law because of my > > > > age > > > > and the fact I have been here for years now.. but today anyone entering > > > > the > > > > Netherlands to stay must meet the language requirement. Muslims are not > > > > a > > > > popular scenario. that is for sure, > > > > Allan > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> No, SD, I believe there's something to worry about ! > > > > >> Reason : Muslims do not keep their religion personal. They demand a > > > >> separate Law for themselves. They make demand on others, for their > > > >> beliefs and practices to be accomodated in the public domain. And, > > > >> they are " missionaries," quite like the Church / Christians were / > > > >> are. They demand that others make way, and accept their superior ways. > > > >> Or else ... > > > > >> That's the worry. > > > > > -- > > > > ( > > > > ) > > > > I_D Allan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
