sharing the smile...

On Apr 29, 7:31 am, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
> Molly, my dear freind, there is always an ache in my heart at the
> thought of that occasion when we may all meet up, give ourselves huge
> hugs, and bask in the pure aura of what we've evolved into.
>
> Then, I shed my light in the intellect and know that we're already
> met. As with the emotion, even the knowledge falls off me, and I
> remain in the bliss of oneness, there and then.
>
> I have said it before, and I say it again :  You are the Angel, the
> Keeper of the Garden, in our midst !
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Apr 29, 3:56 pm, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Infinite gratitude, Vam, for the delightful opportunity
>
> > On Apr 29, 12:19 am, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Neil, I now appreciate the " enlightenment " remarks. It points to the
> > > same " corruption " we increasingly see everywhere. But, the " baby "
> > > is / might be still there in the bathwater !
>
> > > " Saying " is a very sacred phenomenon :  it enables individuals to
> > > touch each other, empower or motivate each other, change each other,
> > > transform each other ...
>
> > > In that domain, there are vast spaces for the " unsaid," the " less
> > > said," the " firmly said," the " clearly said," the " unclearly
> > > said," ...  ... and the attendent emotions and thoughts, tasks and
> > > responsibilities, each such saying leaves upon and for us in their
> > > wake.
>
> > > You are sharing with us the emotions and thoughts such " saying " and
> > > " unsaying " has left or continues to leave upon you !
>
> > > Why or what makes the " unsaid " more difficult to confront ?
>
> > > I can sense that the answer is somehow connected with :  " I suspect
> > > the fact is that we are all more inter - connected than we know
> > > already, yet still talk and act as though we are not."  Do you ? And,
> > > if yes, would you be able to describe / map the linkage ?
>
> > > This is a delightful opportunity for a huge advance in the quality of
> > > communication we've been having amongst each other. LOL.
>
> > > On Apr 29, 4:01 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Some way from what I really mean, I remember many sporting incidents
> > > > in which no one dared admit the team was crap (against such evidence
> > > > as being competition rubbing rags for 7 years).  In rugby, I drifted
> > > > from the first division to second with my best mate (who was
> > > > international class), booze moving from after match pain relief to
> > > > Saturday morning pain precaution.  We never spoke about it, but both
> > > > gave up on the same soggy day of defeat in the mud at Rochdale.  The
> > > > wider unsaid is much more difficult to confront.
>
> > > > On 28 Apr, 15:24, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > I really can't say or shouldn't say, or maybe I'm just afraid to say.
> > > > > But let's say we just say and in that way we play with what is
> > > > > sometimes kept at bay, even if it stirs a fray.  At least in the end,
> > > > > come what may, it could pay to say we had a great day.  Nay?
>
> > > > > Oy veh!
>
> > > > > On Apr 28, 9:01 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > >  I suspect the fact is that we are all more inter-
> > > > > > connected than we know already, yet still talk and act as though we
> > > > > > are not.
>
> > > > > > It seems to be that knowing both to be true is key
>
> > > > > >  What we need to
> > > > > > engage with is kept silent and we may need laughter to reveal it
> > > > > > because we are traumatised to silence through the politesse and
> > > > > > etiquette of old arguments that serve to miss the point.
>
> > > > > > I find this enormously insightful.  I am not sure how to get at the
> > > > > > kept silent.  Kept silent as unseen, unknown - or something seen and
> > > > > > known but feared into silence?  Each would have a very different
> > > > > > viewpoint.
>
> > > > > > On Apr 28, 9:24 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I didn't mean enlightenment per se Vam.  Use of this term varies
> > > > > > > greatly, as I'm sure we know.  It's the business of attracting
> > > > > > > individuals to enlightenment by those claiming to have achieved 
> > > > > > > it and
> > > > > > > who claim to recognise the talent or readiness in others to enter 
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > enlightened state as some kind of privilege that is the old, 
> > > > > > > failed
> > > > > > > fiction.  I suspect much of this is connected to Plato's 3-part 
> > > > > > > soul.
> > > > > > > I haven't time to continue just now and can only say what an
> > > > > > > enlightened world it would be if we were able to celebrate and
> > > > > > > commiserate over an England or India victory in Peshawar - perhaps
> > > > > > > with our grandchildren playing with local children in nearby 
> > > > > > > gardens.
> > > > > > > Cricket would, of course, be an irrelevance to whatever else had
> > > > > > > happened to allow this.  I can strategise what I mean rather than 
> > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > whine as a martyr.  I suspect the fact is that we are all more 
> > > > > > > inter-
> > > > > > > connected than we know already, yet still talk and act as though 
> > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > are not.  Globbalisation (no typo) is a case in point.  I have a
> > > > > > > feeling that wider attempts to describe life as lived (eg 
> > > > > > > AutoGruff)
> > > > > > > could help us work out the actual ground.
>
> > > > > > > On 28 Apr, 10:15, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > This is a refreshing voice I hear from you, Neil !  Would like 
> > > > > > > > to hear
> > > > > > > > of more depths neath what you are saying. LOL.
>
> > > > > > > > For one, what did you mean when you used the word " 
> > > > > > > > enlightenment ?"
> > > > > > > > Why is it an " old, failed fiction ?"
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 28, 10:37 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > [from C.S. Lewis 'The Screwtape Letters' - 1942]
> > > > > > > > > It sounds as if you supposed that argument was the way to 
> > > > > > > > > keep him out
> > > > > > > > > of the Enemy's clutches.  That might have been so had he 
> > > > > > > > > lived a few
> > > > > > > > > centuries earlier.  At that time humans still knew pretty 
> > > > > > > > > well when a
> > > > > > > > > thing was proved and when it was not; and if it was proved 
> > > > > > > > > they really
> > > > > > > > > believed it.  They still connected thinking with doing and 
> > > > > > > > > were
> > > > > > > > > prepared to alter their way of life as the result of a chain 
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > reasoning.  But what with the weekly press and other such 
> > > > > > > > > weapons we
> > > > > > > > > have largely altered that.  Your man has been accustomed, 
> > > > > > > > > ever since
> > > > > > > > > he was a boy, to have a dozen incompatible philosophies 
> > > > > > > > > dancing about
> > > > > > > > > inside his head.  He doesn't think of doctrines as primarily 
> > > > > > > > > "true" or
> > > > > > > > > "false", but as "academic" or "practical", "outworn" or
> > > > > > > > > "contemporary". "conventional" or "ruthless" ... Make him 
> > > > > > > > > think it is
> > > > > > > > > strong, or stark, or courageous - that is the philosophy of 
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > future.
>
> > > > > > > > > Lewis, of course, is taking the urine.  The Enemy is The 
> > > > > > > > > Church and he
> > > > > > > > > is writing in irony (we perhaps know him better as the author 
> > > > > > > > > of the
> > > > > > > > > Biblical saga 'The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe').  
> > > > > > > > > Molly's World
> > > > > > > > > would be very welcome, yet even in there we would have to be 
> > > > > > > > > cautioned
> > > > > > > > > against manipulation like the above and lingering Genghis 
> > > > > > > > > Khans.  Even
> > > > > > > > > tolerance can turn into a dreadful weapon in human affairs.
> > > > > > > > > Deconstruction, in part, teaches a key caution on the 
> > > > > > > > > "objective-
> > > > > > > > > bureaucratic voice" many confuse with dispassionate argument. 
> > > > > > > > >  It is
> > > > > > > > > wary of engagement in any rush to knowledge, but has broadly 
> > > > > > > > > failed to
> > > > > > > > > spot its own rules of engagement - perhaps most farcically in 
> > > > > > > > > its
> > > > > > > > > plaudits to authors announcing the death of the author.
>
> > > > > > > > > Words are little in comparison with a desire to shake my 
> > > > > > > > > friend Vam's
> > > > > > > > > hand over a matter of simply decent engagement which would 
> > > > > > > > > remain
> > > > > > > > > silent in the embrace.  It would be good if India or England 
> > > > > > > > > had had a
> > > > > > > > > close fought victory in cricket and both of us experienced the
> > > > > > > > > meaningless history in buying a drink for the "loser".  It 
> > > > > > > > > might be
> > > > > > > > > better still if the match was played in a Pakistan free of 
> > > > > > > > > strife and
> > > > > > > > > a world free of poverty - a poverty properly defined to 
> > > > > > > > > understand the
> > > > > > > > > poverty of Western "riches" as much as that of an Indian 
> > > > > > > > > population
> > > > > > > > > hoping politicians will put enough food on their tables and a 
> > > > > > > > > roof
> > > > > > > > > against what the sky brings.  We need new arguments and 
> > > > > > > > > action engaged
> > > > > > > > > with them.  The lack of this Slip, is my disappointment with 
> > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > academe that hacks out old nonsense, forever re-packaged - we 
> > > > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > be laughing at it but also reconstructing the chain of reason 
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > knowledge of its modern failures.  In this sense, there is no 
> > > > > > > > > need to
> > > > > > > > > be ready for enlightenment as an individual, yet need to 
> > > > > > > > > recognise
> > > > > > > > > this is an old, failed fiction with much in common with 
> > > > > > > > > dreadful
> > > > > > > > > cosmetic adverts urging 'because you're worth it'.  What we 
> > > > > > > > > need to
> > > > > > > > > engage with is kept silent and we may need laughter to reveal 
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > because we are traumatised to silence through the politesse 
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > etiquette of old arguments that serve to miss the point.
>
> > > > > > > > > On 27 Apr, 19:24, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > God you Turn me On!
>
> > > > > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Apr 27, 11:18 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Very good Molly, it is a recognition of the spark of life 
> > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > energizes the heartbeat, gives breath to
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to