Allan, that comment was not directed at you, and I don't think it fits you at all.
I very much agree with your comment on the Christian leaders. I'd venture to say probably half of them are shysters who don't even believe in what they're selling. peace & Love On May 1, 3:24 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes I know I am not very smart, but I was thinking (oops a very dangerous > situation) about something that Jesus was supposed to have said. > > If you want to be the leader you must be the servant of all.. > > That in away has puzzled me because though many of these leaders claim to be > christians it seems by their actions that every one else is supposed to be > their servant.. > > I am so confused. > Allan > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I guess you ain't smart enough to make a comment :-) > > > peace & Love > > > On Apr 30, 8:32 pm, Justintruth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Guess again. > > > > On Apr 28, 7:22 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > My take on the Dali Lama crying when he was asked if there was an easy > > > > way to enlightenment sets the stage. > > > > > Dali cried because he knows that the way to enlightenment is too > > > > difficult, for enough of mankind to learn, and would never be able to > > > > bring about the transcendence that Buddhism seeks as its flavor of > > > > Unity. > > > > > Why is it that all the great minds of our time and those of history > > > > all converge on the fact that the power for solving all of the > > > > problems of the world is within the mind of mankind, but none have > > > > been able to affect the ways of mankind to bring about any significant > > > > change? > > > > The power connection in the mind has many different descriptions of it > > > > and directions on how to access it. It can be simply a magnificent > > > > light and it can be Jesus in all his glory. And it is exactly what it > > > > is according to whoever is describing it. It is a real thing and > > > > that’s the description that is available from previous information > > > > that has been incorporated into the belief structure of the > > > > individual. > > > > It is energy. It is indescribable. But it is such a wonderful thing > > > > that we have to describe it so we can claim it as ours. The method of > > > > description is metaphor, using that which is familiar to us. > > > > It is a resource for the individual to connect with the collective > > > > intelligence. > > > > When we connect with it we get a personal charge, it is a personal > > > > thing, the opposite of a Unity thing. > > > > We have gone to it (possibly only subconsciously), identified it and > > > > made it our personal knowing and understanding justifier, establishing > > > > our personal religion. And we exclude anything that is not in line > > > > with our personal religion. > > > > This is not the way to Unity. > > -- > ( > ) > I_D Allan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
