Well that is not surprising because very few people are interested in a
spiritual path as they are pew warmers. In the early 70's I lived there in
Oakland and it was not much of a spiritual community then a doubt if it
changed.. Berkley had a drug reputation..  There were always fringe cults
but the fringes are just that fringes, unless you are looking for them they
do not effect you  other than just being there.

I was assigned that area  from  69 thru 74  and that was the impressin I was
left with,,

Is the coffee roaster still in Emeryville?
Allan

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:47 PM, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> true enough...i remember putting out the welcome mat for spiritual
> communication as a child...and i was rewarded. i think the biggest
> dissappointment in my life is that so few people try to 'polish their
> spirit', as i call it. most are scared of any 'alien' feeling that
> knocks on their cranium and do their best to remove or hide from these
> feelings. u and i may know that they are putting a cork on the most
> amazing thing in life, but one cannot convince another of this...
>
> On Apr 29, 10:47 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> > "yes...that is a problem...although one can lead a horse to water
> > they
> > cannot make it drink...in this case, sometimes the water is hard to
> > find, let alone drink." - e-s
> >
> > Exactly e...hard to find...and it is self-protected (gnostic) due to
> > the need to be purely motivated to find and know.
> >
> > On Apr 29, 2:55 am, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > yes...that is a problem...although one can lead a horse to water they
> > > cannot make it drink...in this case, sometimes the water is hard to
> > > find, let alone drink.
> >
> > > On Apr 28, 9:38 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > I just responded on the discussion of 'opinion or bias', "definition
> > > > and/or point of view fuel all arguments".
> > > > I think the personal religion defines and is one's point of view of
> > > > 'spiritual'.
> > > > Spiritual is ones developed or accepted interpretation of the contact
> > > > with the collective intelligence.
> > > > I know what you are talking about when you say spiritual joy. I call
> > > > it connecting to the collective intelligence, and it is exactly the
> > > > same 'thing'.
> > > > Christians, Buddhist, Muslims and free thinking spiritualist such as
> > > > yourself all have the same 'thing' as the substance of their beliefs.
> >
> > > > The problem that I think we need to solve is how to make that
> 'thing',
> > > > known as 'common', amongst mankind.
> >
> > > > peace & Love
> >
> > > > On Apr 28, 8:47 pm, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > as you have mentioned, the nuances of individual spiritual
> experiences
> > > > > are as varied as the number of people who have experienced them.
> some
> > > > > may exclude anothers 'personal religion' if they want, but i dont
> > > > > believe most spirit-humans do so. my experiences have little to do
> > > > > with human life, so sharing them is not only difficult to do, but
> most
> > > > > people you try to describe them to think you are from another
> planet.
> > > > > i dont think many people who have experienced spiritual joy will
> > > > > disregard similar experiences of others, but will gladly share in
> the
> > > > > others joy. this may not be described exactly as 'unity', but it is
> a
> > > > > nice community experience.
> >
> > > > > On Apr 28, 7:22 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > My take on the Dali Lama crying when he was asked if there was an
> easy
> > > > > > way to enlightenment sets the stage.
> >
> > > > > > Dali cried because he knows that the way to enlightenment is too
> > > > > > difficult, for enough of mankind to learn, and would never be
> able to
> > > > > > bring about the transcendence that Buddhism seeks as its flavor
> of
> > > > > > Unity.
> >
> > > > > > Why is it that all the great minds of our time and those of
> history
> > > > > > all converge on the fact that the power for solving all of the
> > > > > > problems of the world is within the mind of mankind, but none
> have
> > > > > > been able to affect the ways of mankind to bring about any
> significant
> > > > > > change?
> > > > > > The power connection in the mind has many different descriptions
> of it
> > > > > > and directions on how to access it. It can be simply a
> magnificent
> > > > > > light and it can be Jesus in all his glory. And it is exactly
> what it
> > > > > > is according to whoever is describing it. It is a real thing and
> > > > > > that’s the description that is available from previous
> information
> > > > > > that has been incorporated into the belief structure of the
> > > > > > individual.
> > > > > > It is energy. It is indescribable. But it is such a wonderful
> thing
> > > > > > that we have to describe it so we can claim it as ours. The
> method of
> > > > > > description is metaphor, using that which is familiar to us.
> > > > > > It is a resource for the individual to connect with the
> collective
> > > > > > intelligence.
> > > > > > When we connect with it we get a personal charge, it is a
> personal
> > > > > > thing, the opposite of a Unity thing.
> > > > > > We have gone to it (possibly only subconsciously), identified it
> and
> > > > > > made it our personal knowing and understanding justifier,
> establishing
> > > > > > our personal religion. And we exclude anything that is not in
> line
> > > > > > with our personal religion.
> > > > > > This is not the way to Unity.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>


-- 
(
 )
I_D Allan

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to