There are two observations I wish to contribute, SD, if I may.

You are right about one belief vs another, and that too is a belief !
And I do not say this tongue in cheek.

But a belief isn't " just " a belief. The ' responsibility ' of
holding the belief is immediately upon us. So, if I believe the rock
is spiritual energy, it becomes encumbent that I ' see ' the spiritual
energy the rock is and ' know ' the truth value of my belief. If I do
happen to know that my belief is true, then I also know that the
contrary belief ( the rock is NOT spiritual energy ) is untrue,
regardless of how many people are holding that contrary belief.
Therefore, equating one belief to another, forgetting how beliefs are
' rooted ' in individuals, seems facile.

Secondly, without the " Why,"  how does one determine what change to
effect. Which leads to whims. However, I do see the importance of
action at whatever that is before us, even if what is before us is not
the " ultimate " we might be looking for.

On May 12, 4:05 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Content is irrelevant, probability is equal in regard to the
> suppositional base of all religious beliefs.  Without empirical
> evidence to establish validity of one belief over another the
> probability remains equal.  Perhaps we can edit out 'ultimate truth'
> which seems to be the catalyst for the focus on belief content.
> So I can rephrase in saying "the probability of one belief being valid
> is equal to that of any other belief".
>
> You think you are going to dissect commentary and take thoughts out of
> context in order to challenge them?
> You cut off "regardless of their existence" which was a reference to
> "beliefs".
> Nevertheless if you must.
> Summarizing suffering into a cause and effect aspect Is another belief
> Not a fact.  There is not one religion, religious belief, spiritual
> movement, revered guru or any other "secret" that has alleviated
> suffering.  So to believe that suffering is a product of a cause and
> effect event is essentially "another belief".  Maybe I believe that
> suffering is the result of humanity's failure to achieve a collective
> mentality, simply another belief.   It isn't even a non sequitor
> consideration as there is nothing that if following but each belief
> stands individually. Put the microscope away!
>
> You don't see how I can believe that the criteria for validity is
> simply belief.  Well that is not accurate because I don't believe the
> criteria for validity is simply belief and don't know why you gathered
> that from my statement, which is........"I just don't see that any
> belief is any more valid that any other belief, including my own."
> This is simple truth.  You believe rocks have spiritual energy and I
> believe rocks  contain good luck and gabby believes rocks make good
> paper weights, so what makes your belief more valid?
>
> I say most problems have to to do with unhappiness because that is
> simple observation Justin, greedy people are unhappy with what they
> have and so need more, Madoff had millions but obviously he was
> unhappy with it.  People that are unhappy with their sex life may
> resort to any deviation to fulfill that void in their happiness
> pocket. People that are unhappy with their  finances may rob a store
> or these days kill their family and then themselves. Now you should
> get out your magnifying glass and look for the unhappiness at the base
> of problems.
>
> When I say "bypassing the Why" I purpose to address the here and now,
> the immediate.  Why waste time wondering about the why of it when we
> can use that time to effect change.  If we could bypass the why we
> could facilitate immediate change and the in reflection address the
> why.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to