Everyone missed you man! :-)
On May 14, 7:15 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's two different labels for the same thing. I have described the
> subset of cosmic energy that is the Life/God force, which is the
> higher power of our existence. There's nothing beyond that that makes
> any difference to us here and now.
>
> peace & Love
>
> On May 9, 10:12 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I had once actually but what I'm getting at is you should make up your
> > mind. Is it the life force or God?
> > Its the connotative relevance issue.
>
> > On May 9, 4:59 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > You ain't never met him either?
> > > I wonder if that picture Mike Angelo drew on the ceiling wasn't
> > > real :-)
>
> > > peace & Love
>
> > > On May 9, 5:33 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > God?
>
> > > > On May 9, 9:49 am, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Soul Pool Dipper?
>
> > > > > Do you think God uses his hand to dip out the Life juice to
> > > > > individuals? :-)
>
> > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > On May 9, 9:39 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Oops, you left out something........
>
> > > > > > This is the idea you present that I refer to as religious 'type'
> > > > > > teaching. <<<Tinker
>
> > > > > > The "idea that I present" where?
>
> > > > > > Soul Pool Dipper?
>
> > > > > > On May 9, 8:33 am, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > " Why was I born with a multitude of talent and not my brother?"
>
> > > > > > > Because you got a soul pool dipper full of talent? :-)
>
> > > > > > > > > The other thing where we diverge is that you believe mankind
> > > > > > > > > can be
> > > > > > > > > taught or will learn to come together by the means of
> > > > > > > > > religious (type)
> > > > > > > > > teaching/learning of the right way to behave.<<<Tinker
>
> > > > > > > > I haven't a clue where you get that idea but considering its
> > > > > > > > vagueness
> > > > > > > > you will have to explain further.
>
> > > > > > > This is the idea you present that I refer to as religious 'type'
> > > > > > > teaching.
>
> > > > > > > However, in general conversation when topic leans, one might
> > > > > > > begin to
>
> > > > > > > > share the ideal. I change the people around me by "example"
> > > > > > > > and they
> > > > > > > > change others with their change and so there is a ramification
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > change.
> > > > > > > > Well how would you go about accomplishing the "common
> > > > > > > > understanding"?
>
> > > > > > > With a universal symbol that points at the connection in our
> > > > > > > mind, to
> > > > > > > our higher power, which is common to mankind.
>
> > > > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > > > On May 8, 10:30 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On May 8, 7:35 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > We do have a whole lot of common understanding, and the same
> > > > > > > > > basic
> > > > > > > > > goal in mind.
> > > > > > > > > One difference we have is that you think the spirit/soul is
> > > > > > > > > other than
> > > > > > > > > and/or beyond Life, ego/self in tow. I think it is an
> > > > > > > > > extension 'of'
> > > > > > > > > Life, and when the Life ceases the life force returns to the
> > > > > > > > > 'collective life force' free of any ego/self. And that makes
> > > > > > > > > absolutely no difference in the idea I'm presenting.<<<Tinker
>
> > > > > > > > This is our difference, and one that has been covered in many
> > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > posts. I feel the soul is unique to the individual and does not
> > > > > > > > return to some "soul pool". When life ceases the Spirit ceases
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > the Soul continues on, retaining human qualities. The
> > > > > > > > experiences of
> > > > > > > > de javu, past life regressions and dreams of previous life
> > > > > > > > experiences, for me, all point to the soul experiences, now and
> > > > > > > > in the
> > > > > > > > past. If my soul was new in 1200 BC then I would have a great
> > > > > > > > deal of
> > > > > > > > wisdom at birth through now, as some people exhibit. If it is
> > > > > > > > as you
> > > > > > > > say, what determines the issuance of talents, intelligence,
> > > > > > > > skills
> > > > > > > > etc, it seems like a wild card and inconsistent with your
> > > > > > > > assertion>>"There is a purpose to Life though. It is for
> > > > > > > > progress of
> > > > > > > > the intelligence that is the Life force." (may 6 in what's the
> > > > > > > > point)
> > > > > > > > I would rather think that Einstein's soul exists today in the
> > > > > > > > form of
> > > > > > > > a young brilliant physicist or scientist somewhere on the
> > > > > > > > planet or
> > > > > > > > parallel universe and not that his soul became part of a great
> > > > > > > > ocean
> > > > > > > > of energy. Why was I born with a multitude of talent and not my
> > > > > > > > brother?
>
> > > > > > > > > The other thing where we diverge is that you believe mankind
> > > > > > > > > can be
> > > > > > > > > taught or will learn to come together by the means of
> > > > > > > > > religious (type)
> > > > > > > > > teaching/learning of the right way to behave.<<<Tinker
>
> > > > > > > > I haven't a clue where you get that idea but considering its
> > > > > > > > vagueness
> > > > > > > > you will have to explain further.
>
> > > > > > > > > The way of Society can be changed with a simple mechanical
> > > > > > > > > switch.<<<Tinker
>
> > > > > > > > Mechanical Switch? Your getting really hazy! Are you talking
> > > > > > > > eugenics? How would you change people like
> > > > > > > > this>>>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,519548,00.html
>
> > > > > > > > > That switch would be the common understanding of the source
> > > > > > > > > of our
> > > > > > > > > spiritual connection in the mind, recognized as mankind's
> > > > > > > > > common link.<<<Tinker
>
> > > > > > > > Well how would you go about accomplishing the "common
> > > > > > > > understanding"?
> > > > > > > > By what method would you get people to recognize humanity's
> > > > > > > > common
> > > > > > > > link?
> > > > > > > > Preaching? Teaching? Lecturing? U Tubing? TV ads? Flyers,
> > > > > > > > posters,
> > > > > > > > bumber stickers? Minds Eye?
> > > > > > > > How would you go about it?
>
> > > > > > > > > "That I know what I'm talking about", was a part of several
> > > > > > > > > things
> > > > > > > > > forming a concept. I was asking you to suspend your beliefs
> > > > > > > > > for a
> > > > > > > > > moment and consider my point of view. <<<Tinker
>
> > > > > > > > It still remains the same, you are forming a concept from
> > > > > > > > several
> > > > > > > > things you believe and projecting it as new.
> > > > > > > > I don't have any real beliefs, they are just ideas, thoughts,
> > > > > > > > concepts
> > > > > > > > derived from personal experience and equally challenged by
> > > > > > > > others as
> > > > > > > > are all the other ideas and concepts. That is why I always say
> > > > > > > > "I
> > > > > > > > think".
>
> > > > > > > > >I am 'trying to show you the way' we Can change the way of
> > > > > > > > >Society
> > > > > > > > > 'Now', and that is not by the methods of
> > > > > > > > > selling/preaching/teaching.
>
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for working with me brother, I Love you.<<<Tinker
>
> > > > > > > > You don't have to thank me for anything. I've never implied or
> > > > > > > > inferred that we can change people by selling, preaching or
> > > > > > > > teaching.
> > > > > > > > However, in general conversation when topic leans, one might
> > > > > > > > begin to
> > > > > > > > share the ideal. I change the people around me by "example"
> > > > > > > > and they
> > > > > > > > change others with their change and so there is a ramification
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > change. Some people just don't want to change, and that is the
> > > > > > > > main
> > > > > > > > problem.
>
> > > > > > > > Now I can send you a starter kit, How to Change the World part
> > > > > > > > 1, for
> > > > > > > > just 3 easy payments of just $19.95, plus shipping and
> > > > > > > > handling. If
> > > > > > > > your not completely satisfied with your order just return it
> > > > > > > > for a
> > > > > > > > full refund, no questions asked, other than, why didn't you
> > > > > > > > like it?
> > > > > > > > Not Sold in Stores! Order NOW!!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
