My dear Lady, thank you for helping me to progress.
I'm about to go out myself.
I will Love to continue whenever it is and however it comes about :-)

peace & Love

On May 15, 5:32 pm, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> I hate to run, tinker, but the family beckons.  Thanks you very much
> for your offering.  I have more questions and am sorry I ran out of
> time to ask.  Hopefully, my associates here will pick up the ball.  I
> certainly did not mean to play Brian to your Stewie, so forgive my
> forthright approach and questioning nature.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RmO6fc-FdE&feature=related
>
> On May 15, 5:02 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I'd rather be a Tao-ist than a scientologist or Brother Dave :-)
>
> > The Tao way is totally passive. They refuse to even think about taking
> > action to bring about change.
>
> > peace & Love
>
> > On May 15, 4:54 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > How would this differ from the Tao? In fact, some of your posts are very
> > > much like Zen Koans.
>
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 15, 4:24 pm, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Ok, so I understand what Chris is saying.  What is your idea tinker?
>
> > > > To establish a common recognition of the connection in the mind that
> > > > is our common link.
>
> > > > > What do we need to recognize that is in our subconscious?
>
> > > > The connection to all spiritual beliefs.
>
> > > >   And how can
> > > > > we, collectively, do so?
>
> > > > With a universal symbol to recognize it and free it from dogma.
>
> > > >   And what will the recognition bring about?
>
> > > > A common recognition of our "One"ness. It would actually be the
> > > > beginning point of Unity.
>
> > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > I understand that we all have the ability to recognize...
>
> > > > > On May 15, 4:13 pm, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Not at all, there is no need to be defensive.  I am trying to
> > > > > > understand your idea.  So far, all I understand is that this idea is
> > > > > > so good, you have stopped reading about any other ideas.  And that 
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > is your idea, not derived from any other (like mine.)  So I think it
> > > > > > is logical for me to ask who Mr. Jenkins is.  Also, the fact that
> > > > > > there is a common thread that runs through us is as old as Hermetic
> > > > > > Philosophy.  How is what you are saying different?  And what is it
> > > > > > that you think we all need to recognize?
>
> > > > > > On May 15, 4:09 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > You want me to put something on the table for you to butcher. You
> > > > want
> > > > > > > to be able to accuse me of trying to shove something down your
> > > > throat.
>
> > > > > > > Again, you refuse to discuss the common link that supports your
> > > > > > > beliefs :-)
>
> > > > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > > > On May 15, 3:50 pm, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Let's give tinker a chance to tell us his idea in its entirety.
> > > >  Can
> > > > > > > > you give it to us without the twenty questions?
>
> > > > > > > > On May 15, 3:41 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > I'm starting to get a Brother Dave vibe here....
>
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Tinker <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > It would be bringing it forward in the conscious mind of the
> > > > > > > > > > individual.
>
> > > > > > > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 2:55 pm, Molly Brogan <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > And how do you think the collective subconscious mind 
> > > > > > > > > > > comes
> > > > forward
> > > > > > > > > > > into the collective conscious mind?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 2:48 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > You are right Molly, I have not presented a clear idea. 
> > > > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > have tried
> > > > > > > > > > > > to get you to discuss something that is common in the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > mind
> > > > of all
> > > > > > > > > > > > mankind.
> > > > > > > > > > > > You can't bear to talk about it as being common to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > mankind.
> > > > It is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > justifier of all that you believe in and if it is the
> > > > justifier of all
> > > > > > > > > > > > that others believe in your beliefs would loose their
> > > > superiority.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm really happy that you are not calling me a
> > > > scientologist :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > My ideas are the common threads of all kinds of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > religious
> > > > dogmas.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > >  So now I will ask, what, exactly is your answer to the
> > > > conundrum of>
> > > > > > > > > > life, tinker?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > To establish a common recognition of the common link in 
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > minds of
> > > > > > > > > > > > mankind.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > What symbol do your propose and how will it work to> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > bring
> > > > the sum
> > > > > > > > > > total of humanity into the same stage and state of mind?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > The symbol will come after understanding the way to, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > bring
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > collective mind forward from the subconscious to the
> > > > conscious. Then
> > > > > > > > > > > > mankind will evolve spiritually, as all the great 
> > > > > > > > > > > > religions
> > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > sought.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 1:54 pm, Molly Brogan <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I did respond directly to you.  As far as your idea, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > you
> > > > may think
> > > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > have presented a clear idea, but you have not.
> > > >  Communication is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > tricky thing, especially when we are responding to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > posts
> > > > days after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > they were saved, and the conversation has gone beyond
> > > > them already.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > We all use the language and ideas accumulated 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > thoughout
> > > > our lifetimes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and they reflect our culture, education, etc.  You, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > sound
> > > > > > > > > > > > > like a scientologist.  I'm not saying you are, I'm 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > saying
> > > > your ideas
> > > > > > > > > > > > > sound similar.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So now I will ask, what, exactly is your answer to the
> > > > conundrum of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > life, tinker?  What symbol do your propose and how 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > will
> > > > it work to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bring the sum total of humanity into the same stage 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > state of
> > > > > > > > > > mind?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 1:43 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Molly, I am wide open to everything presented on 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > forum. I read
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (to understand) every word posted. I don't use the
> > > > "rare and
> > > > > > > > > > wonderful
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > opportunities for self reflection" as a means of
> > > > escape.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I apologize for being so arrogant as to stand fast 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > knowledge
> > > > > > > > > > that I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > have gained and tested over and over again from
> > > > different point of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > views to know the truth. Everything that I know has
> > > > ground in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > great teachings. But it's a bit here and a piece 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > that all
> > > > > > > > > > come
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > together to form a 'new knowledge'.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are the one who is not open to insight. You have
> > > > the most
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > magnificent construction of collected dogmas that 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've
> > > > ever seen. I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't think there is a bit of it that you have
> > > > developed through
> > > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > own insight.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no need for you to "go on", I see the great
> > > > collection of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > intelligence on this forum, that's why I'm here.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You keep trying to pin some kind of ignorance on 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > me. I
> > > > know what
> > > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > know, and you won't even talk about what I know.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why do you come down the page to defend Fran and not
> > > > respond to me
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > above?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 7:38 am, Molly Brogan <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > e, I think that the handle that Francis chose to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use
> > > > in this
> > > > > > > > > > group
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reflects a very real sense of humility.  He 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > speaks to
> > > > us as
> > > > > > > > > > Francis
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the man - not a god or a saint, but fully human.  
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As
> > > > you get to
> > > > > > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > him, you will find his responses compassionate and
> > > > real.  His
> > > > > > > > > > insight
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into tinkers responses here should not be 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dismissed
> > > > lightly.  It
> > > > > > > > > > takes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two hands to clap, and tinker has voiced very
> > > > strongly that he is
> > > > > > > > > > here
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to enlighten us.  He may, indeed, have some 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > insights.
> > > >  But if he
> > > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > open to the insights of Francis or anyone else 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here,
> > > > he will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > missing out on rare and wonderful opportunities 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > self
> > > > > > > > > > reflection
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and growth.  If he thinks that he has grown all he
> > > > can, and that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "others" are here for him to enlighten, I would 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > say
> > > > he has a long
> > > > > > > > > > way
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to go.  This is the message he conveys.  This is 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what
> > > > Francis, in
> > > > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compassion, is trying to tell tinker - that there 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > an arrogance
> > > > > > > > > > to
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to