What you count as his last statement was the first in that post. The supporting arguments followed in the next two paragraphs.
As for his point of argumentation being the absolute, I'm doing the same. Reading between the lines for self-referential or cross- referential implications is an option but should not form the basis of our communication here. It can help to understand each other better, though. On 22 Mai, 21:56, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > "... On May 22, 3:16 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: ..." > > > On the bias-scale that doesn’t look too good for you. Learn to > > fill the content of “truth” with a more unbiased meaning. > > The evidence of which I speak has been implied in many of his absolute > statements but is summed up completely in his last statement that "We > have direct access to the truth of scripture always." --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
