I agree that convict testimony is suspect and damn near useless. Generally I believe the most likely reason/outcome/motivation is the correct one. If I was an evil CIA conspirator and I thought this guy had the goods on me he would have fallen down the steps or been in a car accident or committed suicide long ago. If I wanted to leave a message to anyone else thinking of ratting me out I'd of just made him disappear. A la Jimmy Hoffa.
Conspiracy theories can be fun sitting around the campfire but most people discount them for a very good reason. They just aren't very plausible. That said, occasionally the kook is right. So I say keep at it. I support yellow journalism and muckraking as important aspects of freedom and I would never attempt to silence them. As silly as they sometimes sound; we need people like Glen Beck et al. to keep the big boys honest. dj On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Slip Disc<[email protected]> wrote: > > New charges were filed in 2004, however, after two Denver jail inmates > came forward to say Sonnenfeld had confessed to them during his time > in custody. By then, Sonnenfeld had remarried and was living in > Argentina. << article excerpt. > > Don, really, what did the two Denver jail inmates get for coming > forward? Why would Sonnenfeld confess to two jail inmates during a > time that he was simply in custody? It's not like he was convicted > and serving a life sentence in a federal prison, doesn't sound > right. > If they wanted to eliminate Sonnenfeld then what would stop them from > coming up with a trumped up jail inmate confession? It's too > predictable. Maybe the inmates had personal/racial dislike for > Sonnenfeld. > The other videographer, Chesnutt, in all likelyhood might as well > received pressure/warnings and coerced into offer discrediting views > against Sonnenfeld. > > We can't just brush the 9/11 conspiracy theories under the carpet as > if they don't have any plausibility, that Bush family, collusive with > the Pentagon, facilitated or allowed the attacks to take place in > order to initiate the ensuing invasion. It is common knowledge that > the extended Bush family has had ties to Nazi activity in the past, > those willing to eliminate thousands for the sake of a political > ideal, so it is possible that collateral damage is once again > concomitant of the New World Order of which GH Bush spoke of. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/911_conspiracy_theories > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g > > > > On Jun 30, 11:48 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I didn't remember the name but while reading the article I remembered >> the story. This guy murdered his wife(allegedly) and is trying to >> gain political asylum to avoid going back to prison. He's a bit loony >> as well. A 'troofer.' Here's a more balanced article on the subject. >> Seems obvious to me he's bent. Clearly, if he actually had evidence >> to support his claims he would have put it on the internet long before >> now. He could have used the 'truth' to save him. He doesn't because >> he's not telling it and he doesn't have it. So I believe. >> >> http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_55... >> >> dj >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:42 PM, ornamentalmind<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Kurt Sonnenfeld : Exclusive interview >> > 9/11 FEMA videographer at Ground Zero goes public >> >> >http://www.voltairenet.org/article160636.html >> >> > thoughts?.... > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
