If one had given 'beliefs' authorization to some entity that told lies regularly, would they not still be honest when they espoused their belief as truth? (even though it were a lie)
Just a thought :-) peace & Love On Jul 2, 11:33 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > “we need people like Glen Beck et al. to keep the big boys honest.” – > dj > > I guess I don’t see it for this person. To me, Beck transcends kookdom > entirely. His thinking is in no way logical and coherent. His > presentation is based on drama and emotions. I stop here. Of course > people have the right to watch/listen to him. They have the right to > join the KKK and read Ted Bundy or Kaczynski too. My guess is that, > like all infotainment today, he attracts the confused and ignorant > that feel akin to his presentations. My main point is that his > ramblings and tirades have nothing to do with honesty. > > On Jul 2, 12:18 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree that convict testimony is suspect and damn near useless. > > Generally I believe the most likely reason/outcome/motivation is the > > correct one. If I was an evil CIA conspirator and I thought this guy > > had the goods on me he would have fallen down the steps or been in a > > car accident or committed suicide long ago. If I wanted to leave a > > message to anyone else thinking of ratting me out I'd of just made him > > disappear. A la Jimmy Hoffa. > > > Conspiracy theories can be fun sitting around the campfire but most > > people discount them for a very good reason. They just aren't very > > plausible. That said, occasionally the kook is right. So I say keep > > at it. I support yellow journalism and muckraking as important > > aspects of freedom and I would never attempt to silence them. As > > silly as they sometimes sound; we need people like Glen Beck et al. to > > keep the big boys honest. > > > dj > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Slip Disc<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > New charges were filed in 2004, however, after two Denver jail inmates > > > came forward to say Sonnenfeld had confessed to them during his time > > > in custody. By then, Sonnenfeld had remarried and was living in > > > Argentina. << article excerpt. > > > > Don, really, what did the two Denver jail inmates get for coming > > > forward? Why would Sonnenfeld confess to two jail inmates during a > > > time that he was simply in custody? It's not like he was convicted > > > and serving a life sentence in a federal prison, doesn't sound > > > right. > > > If they wanted to eliminate Sonnenfeld then what would stop them from > > > coming up with a trumped up jail inmate confession? It's too > > > predictable. Maybe the inmates had personal/racial dislike for > > > Sonnenfeld. > > > The other videographer, Chesnutt, in all likelyhood might as well > > > received pressure/warnings and coerced into offer discrediting views > > > against Sonnenfeld. > > > > We can't just brush the 9/11 conspiracy theories under the carpet as > > > if they don't have any plausibility, that Bush family, collusive with > > > the Pentagon, facilitated or allowed the attacks to take place in > > > order to initiate the ensuing invasion. It is common knowledge that > > > the extended Bush family has had ties to Nazi activity in the past, > > > those willing to eliminate thousands for the sake of a political > > > ideal, so it is possible that collateral damage is once again > > > concomitant of the New World Order of which GH Bush spoke of. > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/911_conspiracy_theories > > > >http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g > > > > On Jun 30, 11:48 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I didn't remember the name but while reading the article I remembered > > >> the story. This guy murdered his wife(allegedly) and is trying to > > >> gain political asylum to avoid going back to prison. He's a bit loony > > >> as well. A 'troofer.' Here's a more balanced article on the subject. > > >> Seems obvious to me he's bent. Clearly, if he actually had evidence > > >> to support his claims he would have put it on the internet long before > > >> now. He could have used the 'truth' to save him. He doesn't because > > >> he's not telling it and he doesn't have it. So I believe. > > > >>http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_55... > > > >> dj > > > >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:42 PM, > > >> ornamentalmind<[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > Kurt Sonnenfeld : Exclusive interview > > >> > 9/11 FEMA videographer at Ground Zero goes public > > > >> >http://www.voltairenet.org/article160636.html > > > >> > thoughts?....- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
