"As for Nixon, what little contact with him I liked as a person, and
as a
man,I believe he truly was a good man...." - ID

Rather than rewrite history, let us review it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_z8DjpOo4Y

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPb-PN9F2Pc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxwXBS8AM6M&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CWaUM3kxfA&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YE1PyGzTr54&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdiRnQ4mCD8



On Jul 5, 1:31 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don,
> The function of a corporation is to allow a person to invest their money and
> limit their liability to the monies they have invested. and part of the
> corporate charter they agree to obey all laws. This does not give them nor
> make them citizens,  If a corporation violates the law, it loses it
> corporate skirt (my lawyers explanation) and the stock holders become liable
> to all damages not just their stock value.  Well weasels  i mean lawyers
> have changed the original meaning creating super citizens that are above the
> law.
>
> Don these rights of citizenship need to be revoked. and if corporations were
> held accountable for their actions and their top executives held for the
> prison terms the corporation receive. we would have a lot less crime..
> because the corporate skirt shields them from rape..
>
> As for Nixon, what little contact with him I liked as a person, and as a
> man,I believe he truly was a good man..  with a problem of just being nosy.
> and I told him just that.
> Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:00 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > True. This is the land that I love- the land that can lead me to tears
> > or smiles.
>
> > On Jul 4, 11:18 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > If anyone is offended or put off by an all-in-one reply to a number of
> > > posts, please let me know.
>
> > > Don, I don't want to rain on your 4th but there is rejoicing to be had
> > > hiding in the midst of the slaughter. What is the news is that it is
> > > received from hidden cell phone videos and twitter. And that news
> > > celebrates freedom. The freedom that happens when a government can no
> > > longer keep the voice of it's people locked up and shut away. That is
> > > the freedom that moves me the most this 4th of July. It's a new
> > > freedom that most people don't realize has emerged as yet.
>
> > > And yeah. It was an apology. Gee, George, we're real sorry but we're
> > > taking our leave of you and shake the dust off our sleeves in the
> > > process. The iconic phrase 'dear john' should really be a 'dear
> > > george'. However, I do think the signers went a little overboard with
> > > the details. A few cursory acknowledgments should have been
> > > sufficient given that we merely did what we could as soon as it became
> > > financially feasible. We were lucky we didn't have to face off all
> > > of Europe with what we were trying to pull off. A fully elected
> > > government? My god, man. What were we thinking?
>
> > > iam, we are completely and securely sheltered under the rule of law.
> > > It never went anywhere. It just got stronger. And eliminate the
> > > corporations? Because that's what would happen if you took away their
> > > status as persons. That would be as bad a jolt as the elimination of
> > > all the banks. Everything would come to a screeching halt. Riots
> > > would erupt like instant cancers across the land. Why would you wish
> > > something like that? I don't think you really meant that, did you?
>
> > > And Jackson? I was just beginning to think we as a species may be
> > > behaving rationally when along comes this circus with half the world
> > > drooling over the center ring and who's that in the box office
> > > twirling his mustache and counting the lucre? That and letting some
> > > sports event preempt the Nightly World News. They both ring of
> > > idiocy.
>
> > > Tinker, think about it. The rule of law is not supposed to be in the
> > > hands of the people. It's supposed to be in the hands of government.
> > > That is one of the reasons people create governments. Otherwise we'd
> > > have pretty much ad hoc chaos. Rules are necessary on several levels,
> > > but I find a general rule of law in civil torts that's we are all held
> > > to. Civil law in most developed nation is based on the concept of
> > > fair dealing and the behavior of a prudent person. The standard is
> > > laid out in four elements. There must be a duty to behave in a
> > > certain manner. That duty must have been violated. That violation
> > > must have caused damages for which people then turn to the courts for
> > > reparation. We can't just whip out our swords and chase down the bad
> > > guy ourselves anymore. Oh, and just who is it that are pulling the
> > > puppet strings of our leaders? I'd like to have their names. Your
> > > rant seems to be winding up and becoming somewhat frenetic. Are you
> > > all right?
>
> > > Don, it may not be up to just the people of the United States to
> > > decide whether to go after past administrations for anything like war
> > > crimes. We've done it and other nations do it all the time and it's
> > > possible one of our allies or even a neutral middle-east nation might
> > > be able to investigate and prosecute perceived war crimes. We
> > > certainly did it after WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and probably every other
> > > war.
>
> > > As a for real right now for instance, the U.N. recently launched an
> > > investigation into Arizona's wild west Sheriff Joe Arpaio for human
> > > rights violations. I mean, everything is still quiet down here, but I
> > > think the reality and shock of it may have not yet worn off. The U.N.
> > > aimed right for the jaws of the beast tackling the most popular
> > > sheriff in Arizona. Joe's already told the press he's not afraid of a
> > > U.N. investigation. He's trying to go down in hisory with the other
> > > Arizona greats. Earp, Holliday, Dillon, Cartwright and Little Joe.
> > > Arpaio was recently elected to his third term as Sheriff of Maricopa
> > > County.
>
> > > Rigsy, I'm sorry, but at one time or another about half the country
> > > felt like you do now, and about half feels the other way. Actually,
> > > slightly more than half. That's what it's like astride a democracy in
> > > action. Imagine what it's like in a nation where rebels overnight
> > > take over the government where you live?
>
> > > The Force is copyrighted? How can that be? It's ... its ... The
> > > Force?
>
> > > Nixon was real dirty but I still liked the guy. I think he did a lot
> > > of good. But he got caught with his hand in the pot wrapped around
> > > the smoking gun with a shit-eating grin on his face. He had to fall.
> > > Either that or shoot it out with the people. And in the instant
> > > issue, I don't think you can prosecute someone for being stupid. Now
> > > Cheney, he may be a feather off a different horse along with a few
> > > other second round hitters. I wouldn't mind seeing Ashcroft go to
> > > prison for a few years. He's so soft and tender and such a fascist.
>
> > > And with you, Francis. And may the breath of Allah caress your
> > > forehead as an evening breeze.
>
> --
> (
>  )
> I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to