Sorry Orn.. I have done worse my self. Difference I didn't get caught. I am not about to condemn my self for what I though was right at the time, and at the time it was right. Allan
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>wrote: > > "As for Nixon, what little contact with him I liked as a person, and > as a > man,I believe he truly was a good man...." - ID > > Rather than rewrite history, let us review it. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_z8DjpOo4Y > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPb-PN9F2Pc&feature=related > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxwXBS8AM6M&feature=related > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CWaUM3kxfA&NR=1 > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YE1PyGzTr54&feature=related > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdiRnQ4mCD8 > > > > On Jul 5, 1:31 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Don, > > The function of a corporation is to allow a person to invest their money > and > > limit their liability to the monies they have invested. and part of the > > corporate charter they agree to obey all laws. This does not give them > nor > > make them citizens, If a corporation violates the law, it loses it > > corporate skirt (my lawyers explanation) and the stock holders become > liable > > to all damages not just their stock value. Well weasels i mean lawyers > > have changed the original meaning creating super citizens that are above > the > > law. > > > > Don these rights of citizenship need to be revoked. and if corporations > were > > held accountable for their actions and their top executives held for the > > prison terms the corporation receive. we would have a lot less crime.. > > because the corporate skirt shields them from rape.. > > > > As for Nixon, what little contact with him I liked as a person, and as a > > man,I believe he truly was a good man.. with a problem of just being > nosy. > > and I told him just that. > > Allan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:00 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > True. This is the land that I love- the land that can lead me to tears > > > or smiles. > > > > > On Jul 4, 11:18 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If anyone is offended or put off by an all-in-one reply to a number > of > > > > posts, please let me know. > > > > > > Don, I don't want to rain on your 4th but there is rejoicing to be > had > > > > hiding in the midst of the slaughter. What is the news is that it is > > > > received from hidden cell phone videos and twitter. And that news > > > > celebrates freedom. The freedom that happens when a government can no > > > > longer keep the voice of it's people locked up and shut away. That is > > > > the freedom that moves me the most this 4th of July. It's a new > > > > freedom that most people don't realize has emerged as yet. > > > > > > And yeah. It was an apology. Gee, George, we're real sorry but we're > > > > taking our leave of you and shake the dust off our sleeves in the > > > > process. The iconic phrase 'dear john' should really be a 'dear > > > > george'. However, I do think the signers went a little overboard with > > > > the details. A few cursory acknowledgments should have been > > > > sufficient given that we merely did what we could as soon as it > became > > > > financially feasible. We were lucky we didn't have to face off all > > > > of Europe with what we were trying to pull off. A fully elected > > > > government? My god, man. What were we thinking? > > > > > > iam, we are completely and securely sheltered under the rule of law. > > > > It never went anywhere. It just got stronger. And eliminate the > > > > corporations? Because that's what would happen if you took away their > > > > status as persons. That would be as bad a jolt as the elimination of > > > > all the banks. Everything would come to a screeching halt. Riots > > > > would erupt like instant cancers across the land. Why would you wish > > > > something like that? I don't think you really meant that, did you? > > > > > > And Jackson? I was just beginning to think we as a species may be > > > > behaving rationally when along comes this circus with half the world > > > > drooling over the center ring and who's that in the box office > > > > twirling his mustache and counting the lucre? That and letting some > > > > sports event preempt the Nightly World News. They both ring of > > > > idiocy. > > > > > > Tinker, think about it. The rule of law is not supposed to be in the > > > > hands of the people. It's supposed to be in the hands of government. > > > > That is one of the reasons people create governments. Otherwise we'd > > > > have pretty much ad hoc chaos. Rules are necessary on several levels, > > > > but I find a general rule of law in civil torts that's we are all > held > > > > to. Civil law in most developed nation is based on the concept of > > > > fair dealing and the behavior of a prudent person. The standard is > > > > laid out in four elements. There must be a duty to behave in a > > > > certain manner. That duty must have been violated. That violation > > > > must have caused damages for which people then turn to the courts for > > > > reparation. We can't just whip out our swords and chase down the bad > > > > guy ourselves anymore. Oh, and just who is it that are pulling the > > > > puppet strings of our leaders? I'd like to have their names. Your > > > > rant seems to be winding up and becoming somewhat frenetic. Are you > > > > all right? > > > > > > Don, it may not be up to just the people of the United States to > > > > decide whether to go after past administrations for anything like war > > > > crimes. We've done it and other nations do it all the time and it's > > > > possible one of our allies or even a neutral middle-east nation might > > > > be able to investigate and prosecute perceived war crimes. We > > > > certainly did it after WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and probably every other > > > > war. > > > > > > As a for real right now for instance, the U.N. recently launched an > > > > investigation into Arizona's wild west Sheriff Joe Arpaio for human > > > > rights violations. I mean, everything is still quiet down here, but I > > > > think the reality and shock of it may have not yet worn off. The U.N. > > > > aimed right for the jaws of the beast tackling the most popular > > > > sheriff in Arizona. Joe's already told the press he's not afraid of a > > > > U.N. investigation. He's trying to go down in hisory with the other > > > > Arizona greats. Earp, Holliday, Dillon, Cartwright and Little Joe. > > > > Arpaio was recently elected to his third term as Sheriff of Maricopa > > > > County. > > > > > > Rigsy, I'm sorry, but at one time or another about half the country > > > > felt like you do now, and about half feels the other way. Actually, > > > > slightly more than half. That's what it's like astride a democracy in > > > > action. Imagine what it's like in a nation where rebels overnight > > > > take over the government where you live? > > > > > > The Force is copyrighted? How can that be? It's ... its ... The > > > > Force? > > > > > > Nixon was real dirty but I still liked the guy. I think he did a lot > > > > of good. But he got caught with his hand in the pot wrapped around > > > > the smoking gun with a shit-eating grin on his face. He had to fall. > > > > Either that or shoot it out with the people. And in the instant > > > > issue, I don't think you can prosecute someone for being stupid. Now > > > > Cheney, he may be a feather off a different horse along with a few > > > > other second round hitters. I wouldn't mind seeing Ashcroft go to > > > > prison for a few years. He's so soft and tender and such a fascist. > > > > > > And with you, Francis. And may the breath of Allah caress your > > > > forehead as an evening breeze. > > > > -- > > ( > > ) > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- ( ) I_D Allan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
