I was lamenting the fact that we are hearing and seeing something truly extraordinary and yet we are apparently doing nothing about it. This makes Gitmo and Abu Graib(anybody remember that?) look like a sweet 16 party. It's like page 6 somewhere near the bottom news, if that. WTF? While this is encouraging...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/05/world/middleeast/05iran.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper where is the leader of the free world on this? Try this, google 'Obama concerned' and check out all the hits. It'd be hilarious if it wasn't so depressing. He's the most concerned president in history and yet he's so nuanced he doesn't do anything but say how concerned he is. He's still voting 'present.' Amazing. And no, I'm not all right, I think I've managed to rupture my spleen thinking about this. Oh, and just who is it that are pulling the > puppet strings of our leaders? -gruff The Illuminati of course. In league with visitors from outer space. I just hope they're not here to eat us. The day we send our ex-politicians off to the UN to be tried is the day we are officially dead as a world leader. That doesn't happen to super powers. We may be winding down as a super power but we aren't finished yet. No sir, not yet. dj On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:18 PM, gruff<[email protected]> wrote: > > If anyone is offended or put off by an all-in-one reply to a number of > posts, please let me know. > > Don, I don't want to rain on your 4th but there is rejoicing to be had > hiding in the midst of the slaughter. What is the news is that it is > received from hidden cell phone videos and twitter. And that news > celebrates freedom. The freedom that happens when a government can no > longer keep the voice of it's people locked up and shut away. That is > the freedom that moves me the most this 4th of July. It's a new > freedom that most people don't realize has emerged as yet. > > And yeah. It was an apology. Gee, George, we're real sorry but we're > taking our leave of you and shake the dust off our sleeves in the > process. The iconic phrase 'dear john' should really be a 'dear > george'. However, I do think the signers went a little overboard with > the details. A few cursory acknowledgments should have been > sufficient given that we merely did what we could as soon as it became > financially feasible. We were lucky we didn't have to face off all > of Europe with what we were trying to pull off. A fully elected > government? My god, man. What were we thinking? > > iam, we are completely and securely sheltered under the rule of law. > It never went anywhere. It just got stronger. And eliminate the > corporations? Because that's what would happen if you took away their > status as persons. That would be as bad a jolt as the elimination of > all the banks. Everything would come to a screeching halt. Riots > would erupt like instant cancers across the land. Why would you wish > something like that? I don't think you really meant that, did you? > > And Jackson? I was just beginning to think we as a species may be > behaving rationally when along comes this circus with half the world > drooling over the center ring and who's that in the box office > twirling his mustache and counting the lucre? That and letting some > sports event preempt the Nightly World News. They both ring of > idiocy. > > Tinker, think about it. The rule of law is not supposed to be in the > hands of the people. It's supposed to be in the hands of government. > That is one of the reasons people create governments. Otherwise we'd > have pretty much ad hoc chaos. Rules are necessary on several levels, > but I find a general rule of law in civil torts that's we are all held > to. Civil law in most developed nation is based on the concept of > fair dealing and the behavior of a prudent person. The standard is > laid out in four elements. There must be a duty to behave in a > certain manner. That duty must have been violated. That violation > must have caused damages for which people then turn to the courts for > reparation. We can't just whip out our swords and chase down the bad > guy ourselves anymore. Oh, and just who is it that are pulling the > puppet strings of our leaders? I'd like to have their names. Your > rant seems to be winding up and becoming somewhat frenetic. Are you > all right? > > Don, it may not be up to just the people of the United States to > decide whether to go after past administrations for anything like war > crimes. We've done it and other nations do it all the time and it's > possible one of our allies or even a neutral middle-east nation might > be able to investigate and prosecute perceived war crimes. We > certainly did it after WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and probably every other > war. > > As a for real right now for instance, the U.N. recently launched an > investigation into Arizona's wild west Sheriff Joe Arpaio for human > rights violations. I mean, everything is still quiet down here, but I > think the reality and shock of it may have not yet worn off. The U.N. > aimed right for the jaws of the beast tackling the most popular > sheriff in Arizona. Joe's already told the press he's not afraid of a > U.N. investigation. He's trying to go down in hisory with the other > Arizona greats. Earp, Holliday, Dillon, Cartwright and Little Joe. > Arpaio was recently elected to his third term as Sheriff of Maricopa > County. > > Rigsy, I'm sorry, but at one time or another about half the country > felt like you do now, and about half feels the other way. Actually, > slightly more than half. That's what it's like astride a democracy in > action. Imagine what it's like in a nation where rebels overnight > take over the government where you live? > > The Force is copyrighted? How can that be? It's ... its ... The > Force? > > Nixon was real dirty but I still liked the guy. I think he did a lot > of good. But he got caught with his hand in the pot wrapped around > the smoking gun with a shit-eating grin on his face. He had to fall. > Either that or shoot it out with the people. And in the instant > issue, I don't think you can prosecute someone for being stupid. Now > Cheney, he may be a feather off a different horse along with a few > other second round hitters. I wouldn't mind seeing Ashcroft go to > prison for a few years. He's so soft and tender and such a fascist. > > And with you, Francis. And may the breath of Allah caress your > forehead as an evening breeze. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
