As long as you still perfectly understand I don't see how you have changed your immature mind frame.
On 5 Jul., 19:24, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > I perfectly understand Rigsy's position; it's one I held, and defended, when > I was a teenager. It's cute, idealistic, and whimsical. Nothing wrong with > that exactly, but shunning the role of an editor, believing writing ability > to be "divine", and thinking out a "complete" first draft (!!!)... these are > ideas are not to be taken very seriously by someone seeking advice on > writing. In fact, they're downright unhelpful. > > There also seems to be this unsophisticated here idea that all literature is > lofty high-art. Most of it isn't, but it's a fine craft nonetheless. > > Ian > > 2009/7/5 gabbydott <[email protected]> > > > > > Productivity software is the expression that makes me want to puke in > > this context, but I will refrain from it because I know what you speak > > of. Do you know what rigs is speaking of other than your own miserable > > experiences? > > > On 5 Jul., 17:39, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2009/7/4 rigsy03 <[email protected]> > > > > > > To have an intrinsic reaction to music, art, words is a divine gift. > > > > There just ain't no software substitute. > > > > There is no such thing as divine, but there is such a thing as > > productivity > > > software. > > > > Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
