What a scene! I'll bring my knitting and watch! :-)

On Jul 6, 8:29�pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with Vam. �He apologised to me some eons ago, though had
> squeezed my balls blue long before reaching contrition and no doubt
> long after I had fainted and he had discovered I am not a white
> colonist. �My old friend can rest assured I will not be patronising
> enough to forgive him and am humble enough not to want to need to.
> Mistakes are just mistakes, as cigars are just sometimes cigars. �In
> Vam's case, a duel at dawn is all I demand, our seconds checking the
> feather dusters in intense inspection before we satisfy our honour.
> Back to back we'll face each other and with our swords shoot each
> other. �I nominate Chris as my second and to sell the tickets for this
> momentous event - one surely more worthy than Michael Jackson's
> funeral to be burned in the public heart. �A last peach vodka before
> one of us must surely die, then each wishing the other good fortune,
> we shall stride to the field of valour, loosing sharpened duelling
> mangoes in the vague direction of fate.
>
> On 7 July, 01:10, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have to wonder why you picked the term "vermin", frankly. That's a
> > pretty loaded word to imply was my intent or meaning. I am simply
> > stating a fact that is quite obvious. And it does impact on our
> > culture and politics. It's no different than what the Indian Nations
> > dealt with with our arrival and expansion. We've been the "melting
> > pot" so we might adapt gracefully to our minority status.
>
> > On Jul 6, 1:31 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I have to wonder why you characterized it as being 'over-run' as
> > > though they were vermin of some sort?
>
> > > On Jul 5, 6:02 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Whites will become the minority in the future USA over-run by Blacks
> > > > and Latinos.
>
> > > > On Jul 5, 1:11 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > We may have started as one but we are many now and whether we will
> > > > > ever be one again remains to be seen. Yet in another sense we are all
> > > > > one since we had a common beginning but I doubt that is of any
> > > > > inherent value. Since we are many what about I Ching? Shall we throw
> > > > > I Ching out the window? (A small theft from Firesign Theatre, mea
> > > > > culpa.)
>
> > > > > On Jul 4, 3:08 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > We need a common point for the cooperation of unity to begin :-)
>
> > > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > > On Jul 4, 2:15 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > That's true Rigsy. But we're just learning those arts. And given a
> > > > > > > dearth of cooperation, I'll opt for some co-dependency in small
> > > > > > > doses. It's a reasonable substitute.
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 3, 1:41 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > There's a big difference between co-dependency and 
> > > > > > > > co-operation.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to