I agree with Vam. He apologised to me some eons ago, though had squeezed my balls blue long before reaching contrition and no doubt long after I had fainted and he had discovered I am not a white colonist. My old friend can rest assured I will not be patronising enough to forgive him and am humble enough not to want to need to. Mistakes are just mistakes, as cigars are just sometimes cigars. In Vam's case, a duel at dawn is all I demand, our seconds checking the feather dusters in intense inspection before we satisfy our honour. Back to back we'll face each other and with our swords shoot each other. I nominate Chris as my second and to sell the tickets for this momentous event - one surely more worthy than Michael Jackson's funeral to be burned in the public heart. A last peach vodka before one of us must surely die, then each wishing the other good fortune, we shall stride to the field of valour, loosing sharpened duelling mangoes in the vague direction of fate.
On 7 July, 01:10, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > I have to wonder why you picked the term "vermin", frankly. That's a > pretty loaded word to imply was my intent or meaning. I am simply > stating a fact that is quite obvious. And it does impact on our > culture and politics. It's no different than what the Indian Nations > dealt with with our arrival and expansion. We've been the "melting > pot" so we might adapt gracefully to our minority status. > > On Jul 6, 1:31 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I have to wonder why you characterized it as being 'over-run' as > > though they were vermin of some sort? > > > On Jul 5, 6:02 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Whites will become the minority in the future USA over-run by Blacks > > > and Latinos. > > > > On Jul 5, 1:11 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > We may have started as one but we are many now and whether we will > > > > ever be one again remains to be seen. Yet in another sense we are all > > > > one since we had a common beginning but I doubt that is of any > > > > inherent value. Since we are many what about I Ching? Shall we throw > > > > I Ching out the window? (A small theft from Firesign Theatre, mea > > > > culpa.) > > > > > On Jul 4, 3:08 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > We need a common point for the cooperation of unity to begin :-) > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > On Jul 4, 2:15 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > That's true Rigsy. But we're just learning those arts. And given a > > > > > > dearth of cooperation, I'll opt for some co-dependency in small > > > > > > doses. It's a reasonable substitute. > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 1:41 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > There's a big difference between co-dependency and co-operation.- > > > > > > > Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
