Somehow, everything today reminds me of music! Here's another method
of walking on the moon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxAPmKLWIyA&feature=related

On 11 Jul., 14:17, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought the 30 degree angle was the moonwalk! Shows you what i know
> about walking on the moon! Thanks.
>
> On Jul 10, 8:21 am, Michael Berkovits <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > As far as I know, the "special shoes fitted into slots in the stage
> > floor which made the moves possible" has to do with the physically
> > impossible leaning at a 30 degree angle that he did in the Smooth
> > Criminal video. The Moonwalk is a move that anyone can do without
> > special shoes. MJ just did it better than most, as he did most dance
> > moves better than most.
>
> > On Jul 10, 7:20 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I think Diane Sawyer explained the moonwalk as special shoes fitted
> > > into slots in the stage floor which made the moves possible.
>
> > > I agree with your assessment of Jackson and two teens at the time
> > > never were interested. An older brother liked Prince for a time.
>
> > > Now, Scott Joplin, Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington are in an
> > > entirely different class in my personal view.
>
> > > I simply tuned out the entire circus event that I was forced to view
> > > till reporters got around to mentioning seven USA dead in Afghanistan.
>
> > > On Jul 8, 7:51 am, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Rather than derailing Molly's thread on beauty, here's a new one 
> > > > continuing
> > > > my discussion with Slip on Michael Jackson and art. Of course, anyone 
> > > > else
> > > > is welcome to contribute.
>
> > > > 2009/7/8 Slip Disc <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > Ian really, the Caravaggio comparison is pertinent but only in the
> > > > > context of that era and Jackson in this era. Equally they crossed the
> > > > > line, creating a frenzy of mind boggling spectacle.
>
> > > > Each to their own. If crotch-grabbing/thrusting is your bag, then more 
> > > > power
> > > > to you! If you think that the moonwalk was art -- rather than a 
> > > > fun/cheesy
> > > > gimmick -- then that's okay too.
>
> > > > I found nothing Jackson produced to be "mind-bloggling". He was 
> > > > labelled the
> > > > "King of Pop", but pop -- by its very nature -- is asinine, disposable, 
> > > > and
> > > > commercial... with due exception given to the genres of indie pop and 
> > > > C86.
> > > > See:
>
> > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indie_pop
>
> > > > Of course
>
> > > > > if you can produce evidence of another artist that issued such
> > > > > extraordinary talent preceding that of Jackson, I, as well as others,
> > > > > would concede to your view.
>
> > > > I can only assume this is a joke -- often hard to tell if we're not
> > > > face-to-face -- or you have had very limited exposure to music. I am 
> > > > happy
> > > > to talk about music and could offer up examples for longer than you'd 
> > > > likely
> > > > care to hear them. However, for the purposes of this discussion, I'll 
> > > > give
> > > > you a single, and I think comparable example, of a male solo writer and
> > > > performer: David Bowie.
>
> > > > > I personally have no interest, never had,
> > > > > in the Jackson attraction. I am only motivated by your lack of
> > > > > recognition of the innovation,
>
> > > > Innovation is a serious word to throw around in music; I suggest you 
> > > > proceed
> > > > cautiously with the examples I am looking forward to you offering up. 
> > > > I'd be
> > > > particularly cautious when referring to Michael Jackson's contributions,
> > > > however, because, as I am sure you know, he did very little himself... 
> > > > thus
> > > > any credit for innovation will be, at the very best, diluted.
>
> > > > > Art is something of a misnomer
> > > > > in that people will and are paying thousands of dollars for
> > > > > contemporary "Graffiti" art, which for me as an artist styled in
> > > > > Renaissance period art view as pure "garbage". So in that sense, your
> > > > > view of Micheal Jackson as less than an art form is reflective of your
> > > > > lack of understanding what "art" is all about.
>
> > > > Mend your tone a little, Slip.
>
> > > > Ian- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to