Yes, which is why I stated "under the circumstances being debated", as I do not believe any copyright laws were broken, or that words were plagiarized.
On Jul 26, 1:19 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > "... On Jul 25, 6:37 am, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: ..." > > > Personally, if someone thought my words were worth repeating, and did > > so under the circumstances being debated here, I would consider it > > more as a compliment, than an infringement. If one does not want their > > words copied, the open internet is the last place they should be > > posting them. > > I'd have to say that would depend on how they are repeating them and > characterizing them. If they are taking my words and reshaping the > thought in their own words, perhaps expanding on the idea, that is > fine. If they are taking my words verbatim and giving me credit for > them, that too is fine. However, if they are simply plagiarizing my > words and claiming them as their own, no that is definitely not fine, > not right, no proper and definitely against the copyright laws. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
