Let me be the first to declare a class action suit. I feel hurt, damaged, violated and suffering extreme depression from all this. I'll need a good attorney, KC you there? No wait, that would be conflict of interest. Okay, I'm willing to settle out of court if you just want to contact me with a reasonable offer, let's say 100k obo. You can send me a cashiers check and I'll go away quietly. ;-)
On Jul 27, 4:55 am, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > Google's terms and conditions are clear: you may not reproduce posts without > permission of the copyright holder (the author of the post). Legally there > is no discussion to be had on this point; neither in public nor private. > Philosophically, as Francis has alluded to, there's probably quite a lot to > discuss. > > Where there is a legal discussion is on what the moderators do about the > fact that one of us has previously given Molly permission to reproduce posts > made to Mind's Eye on her blog. The question is what we do about this (given > that this permission was apparently not ours to give). This discussion only > relates to the indemnity of the Moderators and has nothing to do with the > actual group. Ultimately Molly may choose to carry on reproducing posts on > her blog, but, in my opinion, the Moderators should not be complicit in > this. > > As a writer I value the protection of copyright laws, even if others do not. > > Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
