Do you consider that copyright laws were violated?
On Jul 27, 5:55 am, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Google's terms and conditions are clear: you may not reproduce posts without
> permission of the copyright holder (the author of the post). Legally there
> is no discussion to be had on this point; neither in public nor private.
> Philosophically, as Francis has alluded to, there's probably quite a lot to
> discuss.
>
> Where there is a legal discussion is on what the moderators do about the
> fact that one of us has previously given Molly permission to reproduce posts
> made to Mind's Eye on her blog. The question is what we do about this (given
> that this permission was apparently not ours to give). This discussion only
> relates to the indemnity of the Moderators and has nothing to do with the
> actual group. Ultimately Molly may choose to carry on reproducing posts on
> her blog, but, in my opinion, the Moderators should not be complicit in
> this.
>
> As a writer I value the protection of copyright laws, even if others do not.
>
> Ian
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
