On Jul 27, 6:35 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey BB,
>
> It's what I choose to think. It's a working model.
> Yes the millions of galaxies are there for us, and most likely even
> created by us.

Where do you get your information?  Just curious.  And the sole
purpose of the enourmous universe is for us?....to what?

 >That is, would have been created by the evolution of
> the intelligence with which the Human leads Life on Earth.

Humans create galaxies?  Are you talking real ones or the movie
types?    You are a very confusing person, has anyone ever told you
that?


> The
> alternative would be that we were seeded by the intelligence that is
> responsible for the creation of the universe.

I can live with that.  But this "intelligence" has some very strange
ways of doing things, almost like it could not care less about us.

> I'm 100% with you on evolution.

It doesn't sound that 100% to me.  There are "mitigating factors" that
you have added.

> One for sure truth is "Life, here and now".

OK.   Perhaps that needs a little follow-up to make sense?


 >For any who would argue
> the fact, I would only think it appropriate to the argument that they
> not argue from "Life here and now". So it stands as fact by default of
> rebuttal.

That was not the convincing argument I had hoped for.  In fact I
cannot make heads or tails out of it, sorry.

> One does not have a personal relationship with a force. One can come
> to understand the workings of a force, and I do have that

I do like this part here.  My view of any god is that it is like
electricity.  Electricity does not care about you.  You don't form a
relationship with electricity.  God is simply all the energy in the
universe.  You can use it, possibly understand it ,  measure it, test
it,  but it is simply an independent force that follows it's own laws
and patterns.  It does not care about outcomes, it only performs the
math.  Not a cozy personal caring god that most people want.

> understanding of the working model I referred to above.
> I call it the "'direction' of Society" and will be very happy to
> answer any questions that you have.

I don't even know where to start with that.  I am sure you have
summarized your theory somewhere, maybe you could refer that to me.
Save you all that typing.


> Thank you very much for your response. I would be very happy to
> continue discussion.
> An open mind that can venture beyond one's 'personal belief
> structure' (personal religion) is required to escape the merry-go-
> round.

As I said in another group "when open minded people get out of a
chair, their brain falls out"    (I appreciate open minded within
reason,  I am a stickler for reason)
>
> peace & Love

Yeah baby!


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to