Thank you, BB47. I Like the way you work.
The tone is me. I am a very direct, no frills person. I have not got a clue and am not interested in learning what is 'politically correct'. Too much propaganda amongst that information. I have to lead to where I am (in there, out there?). New knowledge goes through a cycle before being understood and accepted. I am going forward the only way I know. I'm speaking of some thing that is totally abstract to common 'Society' knowledge. It can not be shown at "street level", I come as close as I can. To bridge the gap, one has to ask questions, I can't force feed the knowledge. I thank you again for input and consideration. peace & Love On Jul 29, 10:21 am, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote: > Tinker- I am guessing you would not take it as an insult if I said > your are really "out there?" > Perhaps you would prefer I said "in there?" > > You have some interesting ideas. Can I make some observations? I > hope you don't take it the wrong way, I am just being honest, > forthright and as clear as I am able. (that is my job....no , I do > not get paid) and I am not insulting you intentionally. (I can do > far better than this on a bad day) > > Your "tone" that you present your ideas in has this "eau- de guru" > While this may be "you" I don't think it is the most effective way to > reach people, if indeed that is your goal. > This is just my opinion. Most of the people on this earth are not > "there" with you, they are down in the trenches cussing. > > Perhaps this is not my place to even mention, sorry, but perhaps if > you explained your ideas in a more "street level" way? More > examples! I always liked examples in school. Those helped me the > most. I am a concept guy. Or analogies. I am a huge fan. Sure, they > are not as accurate, but they convey ideas to those who are far , far > away in a distant place from you. > > Now that I have that over with, I will have to try and absorb > your writings before I ask questions. > > On Jul 28, 6:57 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I got my information from 30 years of seeking to understand what was > > wrong with the way of Society. > > I believe that the man Jesus and the man Buddha (plus others) saw a > > possibility for mankind to change the way of Society by overcoming > > some inherent fault in the way of Society. My seeking was to find that > > fault. > > > I don't know about the sole purpose of the universe, but it is open to > > the Human Potential. As I said above, we may be the creators, or a > > seed of creators. > > > Yes sir, going beyond established knowledge can be confusing because > > you have to define it anew as you go. > > > The Human, our collective intelligence, could have created the > > universe in the same respect that our individual intelligence defines > > and creates on the Earth. > > This is all speculation and not of any concern to me. It 'could be' > > considering the power the Human will have if we were to correct the > > way of Society. > > > Yes sir again. There ain't nothing or nobody that gives a shit about > > the Human on Earth. That is why I limit 'any god' to the Collective of > > Earth. > > > The 100% would be Darwinism, yes I go beyond that. > > > "Life, here and now", really should stand alone as the absolute of the > > existence of the Human. The follow up of that was simply my answer to > > spiritualist who try to deny Life's significance. > > > YES! The "God" relative to earth is a very simple yin/yang force. > > We can work with the math. > > My theory can be found at the web site on my profile. > > > An open mind with out reason is an empty head :-) > > > peace & Love > > > On Jul 28, 1:29 am, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Jul 27, 6:35 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey BB, > > > > > It's what I choose to think. It's a working model. > > > > Yes the millions of galaxies are there for us, and most likely even > > > > created by us. > > > > Where do you get your information? Just curious. And the sole > > > purpose of the enourmous universe is for us?....to what? > > > > >That is, would have been created by the evolution of > > > > > the intelligence with which the Human leads Life on Earth. > > > > Humans create galaxies? Are you talking real ones or the movie > > > types? You are a very confusing person, has anyone ever told you > > > that? > > > > > The > > > > alternative would be that we were seeded by the intelligence that is > > > > responsible for the creation of the universe. > > > > I can live with that. But this "intelligence" has some very strange > > > ways of doing things, almost like it could not care less about us. > > > > > I'm 100% with you on evolution. > > > > It doesn't sound that 100% to me. There are "mitigating factors" that > > > you have added. > > > > > One for sure truth is "Life, here and now". > > > > OK. Perhaps that needs a little follow-up to make sense? > > > > >For any who would argue > > > > the fact, I would only think it appropriate to the argument that they > > > > not argue from "Life here and now". So it stands as fact by default of > > > > rebuttal. > > > > That was not the convincing argument I had hoped for. In fact I > > > cannot make heads or tails out of it, sorry. > > > > > One does not have a personal relationship with a force. One can come > > > > to understand the workings of a force, and I do have that > > > > I do like this part here. My view of any god is that it is like > > > electricity. Electricity does not care about you. You don't form a > > > relationship with electricity. God is simply all the energy in the > > > universe. You can use it, possibly understand it , measure it, test > > > it, but it is simply an independent force that follows it's own laws > > > and patterns. It does not care about outcomes, it only performs the > > > math. Not a cozy personal caring god that most people want. > > > > > understanding of the working model I referred to above. > > > > I call it the "'direction' of Society" and will be very happy to > > > > answer any questions that you have. > > > > I don't even know where to start with that. I am sure you have > > > summarized your theory somewhere, maybe you could refer that to me. > > > Save you all that typing. > > > > > Thank you very much for your response. I would be very happy to > > > > continue discussion. > > > > An open mind that can venture beyond one's 'personal belief > > > > structure' (personal religion) is required to escape the merry-go- > > > > round. > > > > As I said in another group "when open minded people get out of a > > > chair, their brain falls out" (I appreciate open minded within > > > reason, I am a stickler for reason) > > > > > peace & Love > > > > Yeah baby!- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
