If examined, current theories of the brain address three basic
brains.

Reptilian, mammalian and the cortex.

http://www.psycheducation.org/emotion/triune%20brain.htm

If you don’t like that site, use google and find one that suits you.


On Jul 30, 9:18 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, I know about the 'little head' brain but what's the 3rd brain and
> what does it control?
>
> dj
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:50 PM, ornamentalmind<[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
> > As a scientific aside here, we do have three brains...each with a
> > different function.
>
> > On Jul 30, 5:50 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Lee, we can choose to eat more or less, choose to fast or starve, we
> >> can choose to sweat in the heat or hang out at the market freezer
> >> section.  But these are not pertinent to the control issue in the
> >> context of this thread or my intended course of elicitation.
> >> Primarily we are looking at personal space, our self, our being, modus
> >> operandi, the whole concept of what we think and do and "Not" about
> >> our bowel movements, sweat glands or the control of such.
> >> Further to clarify, I did not say, as you put it, "some of us eat too
> >> much", I did say "........we eat more than is necessary to
> >> survive.......".   This is not a definitive of what is "too much"
> >> eating.  Personally I wouldn't want to live on the survival diet but
> >> just because I'm eating more than necessary for survival doesn't  mean
> >> I'm eating too much.
>
> >> On Jul 30, 4:02 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > Well Slip,
>
> >> > You have said yourself that perhaps ome of us eat too much.  So there
> >> > must be an element of control there?  If we can choose to eat less
> >> > then that is a choice we make and thus we can control that.
>
> >> > You are correct though with the sweat thing, and altough it may appear
> >> > I'm being pedantic, what you say really just backs up what I say.  The
> >> > issue is one of ultimate control of ourselves, if you cannot control
> >> > when and how much you sweat then surly the control of yourself that
> >> > you have is not ultimate huh?
>
> >> > Ohh I was in fact a veggie for a few years, only because when I meet
> >> > the woman who would become my wife, she was one.
>
> >> > On 27 July, 11:56, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > Would you actually go that far as to say the necessity of eating is a
> >> > > control issue.  You know you love your sausage grilled, butcher Lee,
> >> > > and the other cuts as well.  I don't recall you being a vegan.
> >> > > But point is we love to eat, we choose to eat and fact is we eat more
> >> > > than is necessary to survive which makes it a definite "choice" and
> >> > > not a control.  We might as well add in bodily functions as being a
> >> > > control thing if we look at it your way.   Is it a control issue
> >> > > because I sweat when it is hot humid?
>
> >> > > On Jul 27, 5:43 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > Yeah I sorta agree with you.  We are largly free where it really
> >> > > > matters, in the head.  But do we really have ultimate control over
> >> > > > ourselves?
>
> >> > > > I can't help but think that if I don't eat then I die, so there is no
> >> > > > control there at all, I must eat or die, this is not my choice and so
> >> > > > I have no control over it.
>
> >> > > > On 27 July, 07:05, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > I am new here.  I like having control.  My last post did not show 
> >> > > > > up
> >> > > > > so I looked at the guidelines (I really didn't think I would have 
> >> > > > > to,
> >> > > > > after all  I am a wonderful human being.... sometimes)  and I found
> >> > > > > out that I am on "moderation" at the start (this is where I get to 
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > control issue)
>
> >> > > > >    It is not a good feeling not being in control,  but we do have
> >> > > > > ultimate control over ourselves, barring an illness or mental 
> >> > > > > chemical
> >> > > > > fiasco, and that might be the only control we may get that we can 
> >> > > > > rely
> >> > > > > on.   People are controlling.  They often have good reasons.
> >> > > > > Sometimes they are just jerks,  but humans as a whole have
> >> > > > > demonstrated over and over that they prefer to control other human
> >> > > > > beings rather than let them do whatever they choose.  It is a fine
> >> > > > > line.  Obviously, control can be good for some causes and not for
> >> > > > > others.   It might depend on whether you have an Egalitarian or a
> >> > > > > "collective"  type philosophy, with the "good for most" beliefs.
> >> > > > > I really don't like that myself. I am an individualist.  But I also
> >> > > > > admit that some control is necessary.
>
> >> > > > >    We can hope that the "people in control"  have wisdom, fairness,
> >> > > > > and sound judgement.  When the hell has that ever happened in 
> >> > > > > history?
> >> > > > > No, seriously, sometimes it happens.  Not often enough for me.  (I 
> >> > > > > am
> >> > > > > not saying I have those qualities nor would know them if they ran 
> >> > > > > me
> >> > > > > over)
>
> >> > > > > On Jul 26, 5:19 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > We had Molly's wonderful post gone chaotic concerning control and
> >> > > > > > since then I thought of other aspects of control and being in 
> >> > > > > > control
> >> > > > > > and whether or not we are supposed to be in control.
> >> > > > > > I hear evangelists speak of turning your life over to God, 
> >> > > > > > letting the
> >> > > > > > Holy Spirit guide you.  I hear of following rules and 
> >> > > > > > regulations,
> >> > > > > > laws and dictum of governing bodies.  I ask myself, where is 
> >> > > > > > there any
> >> > > > > > room left for us to have any control?
> >> > > > > > This goes beyond the Molly post as being self and the awareness 
> >> > > > > > of
> >> > > > > > decision that was made prior.  Are we not mostly controlled 
> >> > > > > > beings?
> >> > > > > > Isn't control limited to our personal space and even then 
> >> > > > > > limited to
> >> > > > > > no one knowing about that space?  Isn't it true, what has been 
> >> > > > > > said,
> >> > > > > > that the only privacy we have is that which exists in our minds? 
> >> > > > > >  But
> >> > > > > > then again, when we talk about control, spiritual control, 
> >> > > > > > external
> >> > > > > > control isn't that also a matter that is questionable?- Hide 
> >> > > > > > quoted text -
>
> >> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to