I need to do my little joke here:  it should be a cartoon, just poking
innocent fun, I swear

Molly:   "I want to raise awareness of my issue"
Political advisor:  "Ok, what is your issue?"
Molly:  " that humans are not aware that we are actually not in
control of our own choices"
Political advisor:   "You know what?  I might be able to run with that


On Jul 30, 6:46 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> I feel it is true that each time we make a choice, we are not
> necessarily controlling.  It was suggested to me in a different group
> that "if you seek the control of something of any nature , that this
> would be your ego wanting control and your ego would manifest whatever
> it is you are putting the energy into.
> I think that the ego has a measure of free will , but this in reality
> is controlled by your concepts of reality. I think that the only true
> free will would be obtained by someone who has an enlightened
> consciousness and not bound by the frame work of the egoic mind."
>
> I sense some wisdom here, in that our need to possess and control may
> indeed be an egoic impulse, feeding an egotistical self image.  "The
> more I have, the more what I say goes, the more that I dominate, the
> bigger and stronger a person I am," would be the thoughts of an ego in
> need of control, or out of control...
>
> I think that, beyond directing our thoughts, feelings and bodily
> functions (hopefully for our betterment) - our economic systems give
> us a sense of control.  If I spend a year on a painting or a novel, it
> is mine until I want to sell it and make my living on it.  I have a
> friend who rebuilds and restyles Detroit muscle cars, and makes a big
> investment in time and money expressing his talent in this way.  These
> cars are indeed beautiful. I know he believes that these things are
> his until he sells them and makes a profit.  Are these aspects of
> control, or economy?  I think the control becomes egoic when we begin
> to think in terms of limitation - if he has some then I have less.  My
> friend (although he doesn't) may feel the need corner the market on
> remodeled muscle cars because no one else can do them justice.  Or he
> would only sell to white guys, because anyone else wouldn't appreciate
> them (which makes no sense, and often, the ego in need of control
> makes no sense.)
>
> Indeed, there are those of us that try to control our bodily functions
> through ego - and the anorexic or bulimic eating disorder arises.
> There are lots of interesting albeit destructive things that humans do
> to their bodies to feel a sense of control, because there self image
> dictates it.
>
> On Jul 30, 8:50 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Lee, we can choose to eat more or less, choose to fast or starve, we
> > can choose to sweat in the heat or hang out at the market freezer
> > section.  But these are not pertinent to the control issue in the
> > context of this thread or my intended course of elicitation.
> > Primarily we are looking at personal space, our self, our being, modus
> > operandi, the whole concept of what we think and do and "Not" about
> > our bowel movements, sweat glands or the control of such.
> > Further to clarify, I did not say, as you put it, "some of us eat too
> > much", I did say "........we eat more than is necessary to
> > survive.......".   This is not a definitive of what is "too much"
> > eating.  Personally I wouldn't want to live on the survival diet but
> > just because I'm eating more than necessary for survival doesn't  mean
> > I'm eating too much.
>
> > On Jul 30, 4:02 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Well Slip,
>
> > > You have said yourself that perhaps ome of us eat too much.  So there
> > > must be an element of control there?  If we can choose to eat less
> > > then that is a choice we make and thus we can control that.
>
> > > You are correct though with the sweat thing, and altough it may appear
> > > I'm being pedantic, what you say really just backs up what I say.  The
> > > issue is one of ultimate control of ourselves, if you cannot control
> > > when and how much you sweat then surly the control of yourself that
> > > you have is not ultimate huh?
>
> > > Ohh I was in fact a veggie for a few years, only because when I meet
> > > the woman who would become my wife, she was one.
>
> > > On 27 July, 11:56, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Would you actually go that far as to say the necessity of eating is a
> > > > control issue.  You know you love your sausage grilled, butcher Lee,
> > > > and the other cuts as well.  I don't recall you being a vegan.
> > > > But point is we love to eat, we choose to eat and fact is we eat more
> > > > than is necessary to survive which makes it a definite "choice" and
> > > > not a control.  We might as well add in bodily functions as being a
> > > > control thing if we look at it your way.   Is it a control issue
> > > > because I sweat when it is hot humid?
>
> > > > On Jul 27, 5:43 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > Yeah I sorta agree with you.  We are largly free where it really
> > > > > matters, in the head.  But do we really have ultimate control over
> > > > > ourselves?
>
> > > > > I can't help but think that if I don't eat then I die, so there is no
> > > > > control there at all, I must eat or die, this is not my choice and so
> > > > > I have no control over it.
>
> > > > > On 27 July, 07:05, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I am new here.  I like having control.  My last post did not show up
> > > > > > so I looked at the guidelines (I really didn't think I would have 
> > > > > > to,
> > > > > > after all  I am a wonderful human being.... sometimes)  and I found
> > > > > > out that I am on "moderation" at the start (this is where I get to 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > control issue)
>
> > > > > >    It is not a good feeling not being in control,  but we do have
> > > > > > ultimate control over ourselves, barring an illness or mental 
> > > > > > chemical
> > > > > > fiasco, and that might be the only control we may get that we can 
> > > > > > rely
> > > > > > on.   People are controlling.  They often have good reasons.
> > > > > > Sometimes they are just jerks,  but humans as a whole have
> > > > > > demonstrated over and over that they prefer to control other human
> > > > > > beings rather than let them do whatever they choose.  It is a fine
> > > > > > line.  Obviously, control can be good for some causes and not for
> > > > > > others.   It might depend on whether you have an Egalitarian or a
> > > > > > "collective"  type philosophy, with the "good for most" beliefs.
> > > > > > I really don't like that myself. I am an individualist.  But I also
> > > > > > admit that some control is necessary.
>
> > > > > >    We can hope that the "people in control"  have wisdom, fairness,
> > > > > > and sound judgement.  When the hell has that ever happened in 
> > > > > > history?
> > > > > > No, seriously, sometimes it happens.  Not often enough for me.  (I 
> > > > > > am
> > > > > > not saying I have those qualities nor would know them if they ran me
> > > > > > over)
>
> > > > > > On Jul 26, 5:19 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > We had Molly's wonderful post gone chaotic concerning control and
> > > > > > > since then I thought of other aspects of control and being in 
> > > > > > > control
> > > > > > > and whether or not we are supposed to be in control.
> > > > > > > I hear evangelists speak of turning your life over to God, 
> > > > > > > letting the
> > > > > > > Holy Spirit guide you.  I hear of following rules and regulations,
> > > > > > > laws and dictum of governing bodies.  I ask myself, where is 
> > > > > > > there any
> > > > > > > room left for us to have any control?
> > > > > > > This goes beyond the Molly post as being self and the awareness of
> > > > > > > decision that was made prior.  Are we not mostly controlled 
> > > > > > > beings?
> > > > > > > Isn't control limited to our personal space and even then limited 
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > no one knowing about that space?  Isn't it true, what has been 
> > > > > > > said,
> > > > > > > that the only privacy we have is that which exists in our minds?  
> > > > > > > But
> > > > > > > then again, when we talk about control, spiritual control, 
> > > > > > > external
> > > > > > > control isn't that also a matter that is questionable?- Hide 
> > > > > > > quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to